HAUZ vs. DFAR
HAUZ (Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF) and DFAR (Dimensional US Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. HAUZ is passively managed, while DFAR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HAUZ returned 7.77%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for DFAR. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HAUZ charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DFAR.
Performance
HAUZ vs. DFAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAUZ achieves a -4.40% return, which is significantly lower than DFAR's 15.09% return.
HAUZ
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -4.05%
- YTD
- -4.40%
- 6M
- -4.49%
- 1Y
- 1.08%
- 3Y*
- 7.77%
- 5Y*
- -1.89%
- 10Y*
- 3.55%
DFAR
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 15.09%
- 6M
- 15.60%
- 1Y
- 13.30%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HAUZ vs. DFAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAUZ Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF | -4.40% | 22.70% | -5.44% | 6.29% | -18.03% |
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF | 15.09% | 1.31% | 5.25% | 11.04% | -12.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAUZ and DFAR is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022 | 0.65 |
The correlation between HAUZ and DFAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAUZ vs. DFAR — Risk / Return Rank
HAUZ
DFAR
HAUZ vs. DFAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) and Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAUZ | DFAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.18 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | 1.58 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.20 | 4.95 | -4.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAUZ vs. DFAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAUZ drawdown since its inception was -39.51%, which is greater than DFAR's maximum drawdown of -32.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAUZ and DFAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAUZ | DFAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.51% | -32.27% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -8.43% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.88% | -17.64% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.33% | -1.31% | -12.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -14.05% | +2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.35% | 2.69% | +2.66% |
Volatility
HAUZ vs. DFAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ) is 4.07%, while Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that HAUZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAUZ | DFAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 5.04% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.80% | 10.22% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.08% | 13.74% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 19.16% | -3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 19.16% | -2.21% |
HAUZ vs. DFAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAUZ has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAR's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HAUZ vs. DFAR - Dividend Comparison
HAUZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than DFAR's 2.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAR Dimensional US Real Estate ETF | 2.68% | 2.97% | 2.89% | 3.06% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HAUZ Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF | 3.72% | 4.46% | 4.50% | 3.50% | 1.99% | 4.84% | 3.37% | 3.69% | 1.93% | 2.59% | 2.18% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAUZ and DFAR have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAR has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to HAUZ (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAUZ dropped -39.51% vs DFAR's -32.27%.
On 3-year performance, DFAR leads with 11.71% vs 7.77% for HAUZ. On fees, HAUZ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, HAUZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAR has performed better with a 11.71% return vs 7.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HAUZ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for DFAR.
HAUZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 2.68% for DFAR.
They also come from different issuers: DWS and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for HAUZ and 0.19% for DFAR.
DFAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAUZ and DFAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer