HAUS vs. RSPR

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

HAUS (Residential REIT ETF) and RSPR (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. HAUS is actively managed, while RSPR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HAUS returned 10.32%/yr vs 10.36%/yr for RSPR. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HAUS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPR.

Performance

HAUS vs. RSPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Residential REIT ETF (HAUS) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAUS achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly lower than RSPR's 10.69% return.

HAUS

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 7.50%
• 6M: 7.77%
• 1Y: 7.46%
• 3Y*: 10.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSPR

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 1.58%
• YTD: 10.69%
• 6M: 10.49%
• 1Y: 6.24%
• 3Y*: 10.36%
• 5Y*: 2.76%
• 10Y*: 6.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAUS vs. RSPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HAUS Residential REIT ETF	7.50%	-1.14%	15.93%	13.14%	-23.08%
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF	10.69%	-1.88%	8.61%	11.59%	-17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between HAUS and RSPR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2022	0.90

The correlation between HAUS and RSPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HAUS vs. RSPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAUS

HAUS Risk / Return Rank: 19
HAUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
HAUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HAUS Omega Ratio Rank: 16
HAUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
HAUS Martin Ratio Rank: 22

RSPR

RSPR Risk / Return Rank: 16
RSPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
RSPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
RSPR Omega Ratio Rank: 14
RSPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
RSPR Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAUS vs. RSPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Residential REIT ETF (HAUS) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HAUS	RSPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	0.43	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.83	0.69	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.08	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.91	0.72	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.53	1.59	+0.94

HAUS vs. RSPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is comparable to the RSPR Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAUS and RSPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HAUS vs. RSPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAUS drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, smaller than the maximum RSPR drawdown of -41.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAUS and RSPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAUS	RSPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.91%	-41.96%	+6.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.19%	-8.71%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.25%	-17.78%	+0.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.03%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.53%	-1.69%	-2.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.56%	-9.36%	-8.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	3.96%	-1.00%

Volatility

HAUS vs. RSPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Residential REIT ETF (HAUS) is 4.62%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that HAUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAUS	RSPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.62%	4.91%	-0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.51%	10.56%	-0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.45%	14.54%	-0.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.48%	19.13%	+0.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.48%	21.41%	-1.93%

HAUS vs. RSPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAUS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPR's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAUS vs. RSPR - Dividend Comparison

HAUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than RSPR's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAUS Residential REIT ETF	3.37%	4.42%	2.08%	2.61%	2.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF	2.84%	2.70%	2.58%	2.91%	3.14%	2.56%	3.82%	2.48%	3.02%	3.01%	2.06%	1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAUS and RSPR in my portfolio?

HAUS and RSPR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAUS or RSPR?

RSPR has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to HAUS (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAUS dropped -35.91% vs RSPR's -41.96%.

Which ETF is better, HAUS or RSPR?

On 3-year performance, RSPR leads with 10.36% vs 10.32% for HAUS. On fees, RSPR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HAUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HAUS or RSPR?

Over the 3-year period, RSPR has performed better with a 10.36% return vs 10.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAUS or RSPR?

RSPR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HAUS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAUS or RSPR?

HAUS has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 2.84% for RSPR.

What is the main difference between HAUS and RSPR?

They also come from different issuers: Armada ETF Advisors and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HAUS and 0.40% for RSPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HAUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.