HAPS vs. SMLL
HAPS (Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF) and SMLL (Harbor Active Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds from Harbor. HAPS is passively managed, while SMLL is actively managed. Over the past year, HAPS returned 32.55% vs 5.80% for SMLL. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HAPS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for SMLL.
Performance
HAPS vs. SMLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAPS achieves a 18.77% return, which is significantly higher than SMLL's 7.95% return.
HAPS
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 15.97%
- YTD
- 18.77%
- 1Y
- 32.55%
- 3Y*
- 11.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.58%
SMLL
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 5.67%
- YTD
- 7.95%
- 1Y
- 5.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.41K | $1.61K | $1.56K | |
| $12.67K | $15.57K | $37.20K |
HAPS vs. SMLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF | 18.77% | 8.35% | 2.14% |
SMLL Harbor Active Small Cap ETF | 7.95% | -6.31% | 11.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAPS and SMLL is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024 | 0.88 |
The correlation between HAPS and SMLL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
HAPS vs. SMLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HAPS
SMLL
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
HAPS
SMLL
Financial Services
HAPS
SMLL
Technology
HAPS
SMLL
Industrials
HAPS
SMLL
Consumer Cyclical
HAPS
SMLL
Energy
HAPS
SMLL
Real Estate
HAPS
SMLL
Basic Materials
HAPS
SMLL
Communication Services
HAPS
SMLL
-
Consumer Defensive
HAPS
SMLL
Utilities
HAPS
SMLL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAPS vs. SMLL — Risk / Return Rank
HAPS
SMLL
HAPS vs. SMLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) and Harbor Active Small Cap ETF (SMLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAPS | SMLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.05 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 0.22 | +2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.60 | 0.44 | +10.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAPS vs. SMLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAPS drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, which is greater than SMLL's maximum drawdown of -23.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAPS and SMLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAPS | SMLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -23.56% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -15.53% | +5.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -6.17% | +4.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.87% | -8.64% | +2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 7.74% | -4.84% |
Volatility
HAPS vs. SMLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) is 3.12%, while Harbor Active Small Cap ETF (SMLL) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that HAPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAPS | SMLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 5.20% | -2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.54% | 12.09% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.72% | 17.56% | -0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.52% | 20.09% | +0.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.52% | 20.09% | +0.43% |
HAPS vs. SMLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAPS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SMLL's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAPS vs. SMLL - Dividend Comparison
HAPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than SMLL's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF | 0.48% | 0.57% | 0.72% | 0.42% |
SMLL Harbor Active Small Cap ETF | 2.19% | 2.37% | 0.52% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAPS and SMLL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMLL has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to HAPS (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAPS dropped -27.44% vs SMLL's -23.56%.
On 1-year performance, HAPS leads with 32.55% vs 5.80% for SMLL. On fees, HAPS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HAPS has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HAPS has performed better with a 32.55% return vs 5.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HAPS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SMLL.
SMLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.48% for HAPS.
Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HAPS and 0.80% for SMLL.
HAPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAPS and SMLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer