HAPS vs. FESM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HAPS (Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF) and FESM (Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. HAPS is passively managed, while FESM is actively managed. Over the past year, HAPS returned 26.09% vs 46.73% for FESM. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HAPS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for FESM.

Performance

HAPS vs. FESM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAPS achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly lower than FESM's 19.64% return.

HAPS

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 10.18%
• 6M: 10.07%
• 1Y: 26.09%
• 3Y*: 11.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FESM

• 1D: -1.51%
• 1M: 3.13%
• YTD: 19.64%
• 6M: 19.11%
• 1Y: 46.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAPS vs. FESM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF	10.18%	8.35%	4.08%	12.72%
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF	19.64%	17.88%	16.22%	12.19%

Correlation

The correlation between HAPS and FESM is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023	0.94

The correlation between HAPS and FESM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

HAPS vs. FESM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HAPS	FESM
Financial Services	17.7%	14.8%
Healthcare	17.7%	15.7%
Technology	14.0%	21.6%
Industrials	13.5%	19.1%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	7.4%
Energy	7.2%	7.2%
Real Estate	6.7%	4.2%
Basic Materials	6.6%	3.5%
Communication Services	3.0%	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	1.4%
Utilities	2.4%	2.0%

Return for Risk

HAPS vs. FESM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAPS

HAPS Risk / Return Rank: 48
HAPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
HAPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
HAPS Omega Ratio Rank: 42
HAPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
HAPS Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FESM

FESM Risk / Return Rank: 76
FESM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FESM Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FESM Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FESM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FESM Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAPS vs. FESM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HAPS	FESM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	2.48	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	3.34	-1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.41	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	4.61	-1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.81	16.60	-7.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HAPS vs. FESM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAPS Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the FESM Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAPS and FESM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HAPS	FESM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.54	2.48	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	1.29	-0.75

Drawdowns

HAPS vs. FESM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAPS drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, roughly equal to the maximum FESM drawdown of -26.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAPS and FESM.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAPS	FESM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.44%	-26.93%	-0.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.01%	-10.18%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-1.59%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.14%	-4.79%	-1.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	2.82%	+0.15%

Volatility

HAPS vs. FESM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) is 4.32%, while Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that HAPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FESM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAPS	FESM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.32%	5.64%	-1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.76%	13.32%	-1.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.03%	18.98%	-1.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.83%	21.26%	-0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.83%	21.26%	-0.43%

HAPS vs. FESM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAPS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FESM's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAPS vs. FESM - Dividend Comparison

HAPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than FESM's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF	0.53%	0.82%	1.08%	0.06%
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF	0.51%	0.57%	0.72%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAPS and FESM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, HAPS and FESM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HAPS or FESM?

FESM has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to HAPS (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAPS dropped -27.44% vs FESM's -26.93%.

Which ETF is better, HAPS or FESM?

On 1-year performance, FESM leads with 46.73% vs 26.09% for HAPS. On fees, FESM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, HAPS has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HAPS or FESM?

Over the 1-year period, FESM has performed better with a 46.73% return vs 26.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAPS or FESM?

FESM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HAPS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAPS or FESM?

FESM has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.51% for HAPS.

What is the main difference between HAPS and FESM?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HAPS and 0.28% for FESM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FESM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.