HAPS vs. EPAI
HAPS (Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF) and EPAI (Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAPS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while EPAI is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Harbor. HAPS is passively managed, while EPAI is actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HAPS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for EPAI.
Performance
HAPS vs. EPAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAPS achieves a 14.76% return, which is significantly lower than EPAI's 48.89% return.
HAPS
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 14.76%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 30.70%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPAI
- 1D
- -4.72%
- 1M
- 7.32%
- YTD
- 48.89%
- 6M
- 46.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HAPS vs. EPAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF | 14.76% | -0.93% |
EPAI Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF | 48.89% | -0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAPS and EPAI is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAPS vs. EPAI — Risk / Return Rank
HAPS
EPAI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HAPS vs. EPAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) and Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF (EPAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAPS | EPAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.43 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAPS vs. EPAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAPS drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, which is greater than EPAI's maximum drawdown of -12.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAPS and EPAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAPS | EPAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -12.31% | -15.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.72% | +4.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.04% | -2.65% | -3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | — | — |
Volatility
HAPS vs. EPAI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAPS | EPAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.10% | 33.26% | -16.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 33.26% | -12.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.75% | 33.26% | -12.51% |
HAPS vs. EPAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAPS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EPAI's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAPS vs. EPAI - Dividend Comparison
HAPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, while EPAI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EPAI Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF | 0.49% | 0.57% | 0.72% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAPS and EPAI have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HAPS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HAPS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPAI.
HAPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.00% for EPAI.
HAPS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while EPAI is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HAPS and 0.88% for EPAI.
Find the right allocation for HAPS and EPAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer