HAPS vs. AFSC

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

HAPS (Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF) and AFSC (abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. HAPS is passively managed, while AFSC is actively managed. Over the past year, HAPS returned 30.58% vs 34.46% for AFSC. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HAPS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for AFSC.

Performance

HAPS vs. AFSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) and abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAPS achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly lower than AFSC's 25.60% return.

HAPS

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 5.44%
• YTD: 15.94%
• 6M: 13.47%
• 1Y: 30.58%
• 3Y*: 13.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AFSC

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 7.77%
• YTD: 25.60%
• 6M: 20.44%
• 1Y: 34.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAPS vs. AFSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF	15.94%	5.46%
AFSC abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF	25.60%	2.33%

Correlation

The correlation between HAPS and AFSC is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2025	0.87

The correlation between HAPS and AFSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HAPS vs. AFSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAPS

HAPS Risk / Return Rank: 64
HAPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
HAPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
HAPS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
HAPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
HAPS Martin Ratio Rank: 65

AFSC

AFSC Risk / Return Rank: 67
AFSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
AFSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
AFSC Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AFSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
AFSC Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAPS vs. AFSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) and abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HAPS	AFSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.83	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	2.58	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.30	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	3.37	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.39	12.79	-2.40

HAPS vs. AFSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAPS Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the AFSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAPS and AFSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HAPS vs. AFSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAPS drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, which is greater than AFSC's maximum drawdown of -21.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAPS and AFSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAPS	AFSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.44%	-21.93%	-5.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.01%	-10.29%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.34%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.03%	-4.11%	-1.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	2.70%	+0.25%

Volatility

HAPS vs. AFSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) is 4.05%, while abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF (AFSC) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that HAPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AFSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAPS	AFSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	5.48%	-1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.96%	14.61%	-2.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.10%	18.98%	-1.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.74%	22.49%	-1.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.74%	22.49%	-1.75%

HAPS vs. AFSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAPS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AFSC's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAPS vs. AFSC - Dividend Comparison

HAPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, more than AFSC's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AFSC abrdn Focused U.S. Small Cap Active ETF	0.06%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF	0.49%	0.57%	0.72%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAPS and AFSC in my portfolio?

HAPS and AFSC have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAPS or AFSC?

AFSC has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to HAPS (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAPS dropped -27.44% vs AFSC's -21.93%.

Which ETF is better, HAPS or AFSC?

On 1-year performance, AFSC leads with 34.46% vs 30.58% for HAPS. On fees, HAPS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HAPS has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HAPS or AFSC?

Over the 1-year period, AFSC has performed better with a 34.46% return vs 30.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAPS or AFSC?

HAPS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for AFSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAPS or AFSC?

HAPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.49%, compared with 0.06% for AFSC.

What is the main difference between HAPS and AFSC?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HAPS and 0.65% for AFSC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AFSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.