HAPI vs. FJUN

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

HAPI (Harbor Corporate Culture ETF) and FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - HAPI tracks the CIBC Human Capital Index while FJUN tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HAPI returned 20.53%/yr vs 13.32%/yr for FJUN. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HAPI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FJUN.

Performance

HAPI vs. FJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAPI achieves a 8.01% return, which is significantly higher than FJUN's 5.01% return.

HAPI

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 8.01%
• 6M: 8.65%
• 1Y: 22.49%
• 3Y*: 20.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FJUN

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 5.01%
• 6M: 5.27%
• 1Y: 14.35%
• 3Y*: 13.32%
• 5Y*: 11.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAPI vs. FJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HAPI Harbor Corporate Culture ETF	8.01%	16.26%	27.62%	30.29%	10.38%
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	5.01%	11.05%	16.38%	22.30%	6.02%

Correlation

The correlation between HAPI and FJUN is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022	0.94

The correlation between HAPI and FJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

HAPI vs. FJUN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HAPI	FJUN
Technology	32.0%	39.0%
Communication Services	14.9%	10.6%
Financial Services	12.5%	11.1%
Industrials	9.1%	7.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	9.9%
Healthcare	7.9%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	4.5%
Energy	3.0%	3.1%
Utilities	2.7%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.5%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.5%	1.7%

Return for Risk

HAPI vs. FJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAPI

HAPI Risk / Return Rank: 60
HAPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
HAPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
HAPI Omega Ratio Rank: 56
HAPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
HAPI Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FJUN

FJUN Risk / Return Rank: 85
FJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAPI vs. FJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HAPI	FJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.53	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	3.87	-1.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.55	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	3.43	-0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.74	19.75	-8.01

HAPI vs. FJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the FJUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAPI and FJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HAPI vs. FJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAPI drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, which is greater than FJUN's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAPI and FJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAPI	FJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.46%	-13.26%	-6.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.12%	-4.13%	-3.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.46%	-13.26%	-6.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.63%	0.00%	-1.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-1.66%	-0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	0.72%	+1.17%

Volatility

HAPI vs. FJUN - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN) at 0.40%. This indicates that HAPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAPI	FJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	0.40%	+3.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.36%	4.34%	+5.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.84%	5.60%	+6.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.75%	10.55%	+5.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.75%	10.25%	+5.50%

HAPI vs. FJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAPI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAPI vs. FJUN - Dividend Comparison

HAPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HAPI Harbor Corporate Culture ETF	0.80%	0.87%	0.21%	1.21%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAPI and FJUN in my portfolio?

HAPI and FJUN have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAPI or FJUN?

HAPI has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to FJUN (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAPI dropped -19.46% vs FJUN's -13.26%.

Which ETF is better, HAPI or FJUN?

On 3-year performance, HAPI leads with 20.53% vs 13.32% for FJUN. On fees, HAPI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HAPI or FJUN?

Over the 3-year period, HAPI has performed better with a 20.53% return vs 13.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAPI or FJUN?

HAPI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAPI or FJUN?

HAPI has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.

What is the main difference between HAPI and FJUN?

HAPI tracks CIBC Human Capital Index, while FJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HAPI and 0.85% for FJUN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.