PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAL.TO vs. INOC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAL.TO vs. INOC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO) and Global X Inovestor Canadian Equity Index ETF (INOC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAL.TO achieves a 23.33% return, which is significantly higher than INOC.TO's 12.65% return.


HAL.TO

1D
0.43%
1M
4.13%
6M
19.24%
YTD
23.33%
1Y
47.01%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
15.89%
10Y*
12.14%

INOC.TO

1D
0.36%
1M
1.91%
6M
10.80%
YTD
12.65%
1Y
23.05%
3Y*
16.34%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAL.TO vs. INOC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAL.TO
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF
23.33%24.60%21.69%-0.73%3.43%21.17%-2.63%22.29%-3.89%2.16%
INOC.TO
Global X Inovestor Canadian Equity Index ETF
12.65%13.17%11.66%21.10%-5.66%21.14%1.62%25.41%-11.41%2.70%

Correlation

The correlation between HAL.TO and INOC.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2017

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between HAL.TO and INOC.TO has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HAL.TO vs. INOC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HAL.TO
INOC.TO

Financial Services

25.7%
15.7%

Energy

23.9%
13.4%

Industrials

15.0%
13.7%

Basic Materials

13.9%
18.6%

Utilities

12.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
7.8%

Real Estate

3.2%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
15.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

4.4%

Technology

-

7.8%

Financial Services

HAL.TO
25.7%
INOC.TO
15.7%

Energy

HAL.TO
23.9%
INOC.TO
13.4%

Industrials

HAL.TO
15.0%
INOC.TO
13.7%

Basic Materials

HAL.TO
13.9%
INOC.TO
18.6%

Utilities

HAL.TO
12.6%
INOC.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

HAL.TO
3.9%
INOC.TO
7.8%

Real Estate

HAL.TO
3.2%
INOC.TO
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

HAL.TO
1.8%
INOC.TO
15.2%

Communication Services

HAL.TO

-

INOC.TO

-

Healthcare

HAL.TO

-

INOC.TO
4.4%

Technology

HAL.TO

-

INOC.TO
7.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAL.TO vs. INOC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAL.TO
HAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
HAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
HAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

INOC.TO
INOC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
INOC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INOC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
INOC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
INOC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
INOC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAL.TO vs. INOC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO) and Global X Inovestor Canadian Equity Index ETF (INOC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HAL.TOINOC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.99

1.37

+0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.18

2.51

+6.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.38

8.57

+32.81

HAL.TO vs. INOC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.76, which is higher than the INOC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAL.TO and INOC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HAL.TO vs. INOC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.70%, roughly equal to the maximum INOC.TO drawdown of -39.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL.TO and INOC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAL.TOINOC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.70%

-39.65%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

-9.22%

+4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.44%

-14.07%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.43%

-18.53%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.32%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.73%

-4.12%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

2.69%

-1.55%

Volatility

HAL.TO vs. INOC.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.29% compared to Global X Inovestor Canadian Equity Index ETF (INOC.TO) at 2.15%. This indicates that HAL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INOC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAL.TOINOC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

2.15%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.20%

8.66%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.93%

11.92%

-1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.38%

13.41%

-1.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

15.46%

+2.21%

HAL.TO vs. INOC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAL.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than INOC.TO's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAL.TO vs. INOC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than INOC.TO's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAL.TO
Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF
1.85%2.37%2.79%3.60%4.84%2.99%3.57%3.03%3.50%3.32%2.99%3.62%
INOC.TO
Global X Inovestor Canadian Equity Index ETF
1.00%1.66%1.61%2.04%1.82%1.81%2.03%1.89%2.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAL.TO and INOC.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HAL.TO is cheaper at 0.67% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HAL.TO is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for INOC.TO.

Their fees differ too: 0.67% for HAL.TO and 0.76% for INOC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAL.TO and INOC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer