HAL.TO vs. FCCQ.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HAL.TO (Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF) and FCCQ.TO (Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. HAL.TO is actively managed, while FCCQ.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HAL.TO returned 15.10%/yr vs 13.37%/yr for FCCQ.TO. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HAL.TO charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FCCQ.TO.

Performance

HAL.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO) and Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAL.TO achieves a 18.22% return, which is significantly higher than FCCQ.TO's 6.62% return.

HAL.TO

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 18.22%
• 6M: 21.01%
• 1Y: 44.00%
• 3Y*: 21.73%
• 5Y*: 15.10%
• 10Y*: 11.72%

FCCQ.TO

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 2.37%
• YTD: 6.62%
• 6M: 6.55%
• 1Y: 31.83%
• 3Y*: 22.31%
• 5Y*: 13.37%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAL.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HAL.TO Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF	18.22%	24.60%	21.69%	-0.73%	3.43%	21.17%	-2.64%	16.60%
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF	6.62%	31.01%	21.58%	11.02%	-7.52%	22.24%	2.30%	10.49%

Correlation

The correlation between HAL.TO and FCCQ.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2019	0.57

The correlation between HAL.TO and FCCQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.71 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HAL.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HAL.TO	FCCQ.TO
Energy	25.2%	11.2%
Financial Services	24.9%	27.4%
Industrials	15.3%	3.6%
Basic Materials	12.9%	23.0%
Utilities	12.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	10.7%
Real Estate	3.2%	1.8%
Consumer Cyclical	1.8%	5.7%
Communication Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	3.8%
Technology	-	12.9%

Return for Risk

HAL.TO vs. FCCQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAL.TO

HAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
HAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
HAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
HAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
HAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
HAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

FCCQ.TO

FCCQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 63
FCCQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FCCQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
FCCQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FCCQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
FCCQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAL.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO) and Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HAL.TO	FCCQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.64	2.17	+2.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.25	2.79	+3.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.97	1.39	+0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.59	2.78	+5.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	39.20	11.87	+27.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HAL.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.64, which is higher than the FCCQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAL.TO and FCCQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HAL.TO	FCCQ.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.64	2.17	+2.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.23	0.98	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.80	-0.01

Drawdowns

HAL.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAL.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.70%, which is greater than FCCQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAL.TO and FCCQ.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAL.TO	FCCQ.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.70%	-35.31%	-4.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.15%	-11.29%	+6.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.44%	-13.41%	+0.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.43%	-17.97%	+1.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.68%	+2.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.19%	-3.99%	-0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.13%	2.64%	-1.51%

Volatility

HAL.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF (HAL.TO) is 2.55%, while Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF (FCCQ.TO) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that HAL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCCQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAL.TO	FCCQ.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.55%	4.12%	-1.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.83%	12.07%	-4.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.55%	14.47%	-4.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.36%	13.72%	-1.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.85%	16.05%	-1.20%

HAL.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAL.TO has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FCCQ.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAL.TO vs. FCCQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

HAL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than FCCQ.TO's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCCQ.TO Fidelity Canadian High Quality ETF	1.47%	1.45%	1.83%	2.40%	2.31%	1.90%	2.10%	2.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HAL.TO Global X Active Canadian Dividend ETF	1.95%	2.37%	2.79%	3.60%	4.84%	2.99%	3.56%	2.96%	3.43%	3.17%	2.84%	3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAL.TO and FCCQ.TO in my portfolio?

HAL.TO and FCCQ.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HAL.TO or FCCQ.TO?

On fees, FCCQ.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAL.TO or FCCQ.TO?

FCCQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for HAL.TO.

What is the main difference between HAL.TO and FCCQ.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for HAL.TO and 0.35% for FCCQ.TO.