HAF.TO vs. XEQT.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HAF.TO (Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF) and XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) are both exchange-traded funds - HAF.TO is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while XEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HAF.TO returned 2.57%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for XEQT.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HAF.TO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XEQT.TO.

Performance

HAF.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF (HAF.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAF.TO achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than XEQT.TO's 12.29% return.

HAF.TO

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 1.28%
• YTD: 2.84%
• 6M: 3.43%
• 1Y: 3.73%
• 3Y*: 5.57%
• 5Y*: 2.57%
• 10Y*: 3.04%

XEQT.TO

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 5.98%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 6M: 11.20%
• 1Y: 29.24%
• 3Y*: 21.78%
• 5Y*: 13.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAF.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HAF.TO Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF	2.84%	2.56%	3.65%	10.92%	-6.00%	1.88%	2.75%	1.72%
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio	12.29%	19.47%	24.36%	17.25%	-11.01%	18.94%	11.82%	9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between HAF.TO and XEQT.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2019	0.08

The correlation between HAF.TO and XEQT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HAF.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HAF.TO	XEQT.TO
Energy	100.0%	7.2%
Basic Materials	-	7.3%
Communication Services	-	6.4%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.4%
Financial Services	-	20.3%
Healthcare	-	6.6%
Industrials	-	12.1%
Real Estate	-	2.2%
Technology	-	22.9%
Utilities	-	2.8%

Return for Risk

HAF.TO vs. XEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAF.TO

HAF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 19
HAF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
HAF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
HAF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 17
HAF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
HAF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 19

XEQT.TO

XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 75
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAF.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF (HAF.TO) and iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HAF.TO	XEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.55	2.53	-1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.82	3.49	-2.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.47	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.97	3.56	-2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.16	15.50	-13.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HAF.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAF.TO and XEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HAF.TO	XEQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55	2.53	-1.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	1.05	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.20	0.95	-0.75

Drawdowns

HAF.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAF.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.04%, smaller than the maximum XEQT.TO drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAF.TO and XEQT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAF.TO	XEQT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.04%	-29.74%	+1.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.87%	-8.25%	+4.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.94%	-15.08%	+11.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.30%	-19.56%	+7.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-0.56%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.03%	-4.11%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	1.89%	-0.16%

Volatility

HAF.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF (HAF.TO) is 1.68%, while iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that HAF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAF.TO	XEQT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.68%	3.70%	-2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.88%	9.38%	-4.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.84%	11.63%	-4.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.19%	13.12%	-5.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.09%	15.56%	-4.47%

HAF.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAF.TO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAF.TO vs. XEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

HAF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than XEQT.TO's 1.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAF.TO Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF	4.96%	5.05%	5.47%	5.34%	4.36%	2.41%	3.08%	3.23%	2.82%	3.11%	3.98%	3.84%
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio	1.48%	1.66%	2.01%	2.07%	2.12%	1.64%	1.66%	1.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAF.TO and XEQT.TO in my portfolio?

HAF.TO and XEQT.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HAF.TO or XEQT.TO?

On fees, XEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAF.TO or XEQT.TO?

XEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for HAF.TO.

What is the main difference between HAF.TO and XEQT.TO?

HAF.TO is categorized as Global Bonds, while XEQT.TO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for HAF.TO and 0.20% for XEQT.TO.