HAF.TO vs. NUBF.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF (HAF.TO) and NBI Unconstrained Fixed Income ETF (NUBF.TO).
HAF.TO and NUBF.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HAF.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Jul 20, 2009. NUBF.TO is an actively managed fund by National Bank Investments. It was launched on Oct 18, 2019.
Performance
HAF.TO vs. NUBF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HAF.TO vs. NUBF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAF.TO Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF | 0.10% | 2.56% | 3.65% | 10.92% | -6.00% | 1.88% | 2.75% | 1.05% |
NUBF.TO NBI Unconstrained Fixed Income ETF | -1.28% | 6.66% | 1.49% | 5.75% | -6.23% | 0.36% | 6.24% | 0.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAF.TO achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than NUBF.TO's -1.28% return.
HAF.TO
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 0.90%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.99%
NUBF.TO
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- -1.28%
- 6M
- -1.13%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 3.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HAF.TO vs. NUBF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAF.TO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than NUBF.TO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HAF.TO vs. NUBF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HAF.TO
NUBF.TO
HAF.TO vs. NUBF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF (HAF.TO) and NBI Unconstrained Fixed Income ETF (NUBF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAF.TO | NUBF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.13 | 0.71 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.23 | 1.06 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.14 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 0.89 | -0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.74 | 3.77 | -3.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAF.TO | NUBF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | 0.71 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.17 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.17 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between HAF.TO and NUBF.TO is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
HAF.TO vs. NUBF.TO - Dividend Comparison
HAF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than NUBF.TO's 4.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAF.TO Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF | 5.01% | 5.05% | 5.47% | 5.34% | 4.36% | 2.41% | 3.08% | 3.23% | 2.82% | 3.11% | 3.98% | 3.84% |
NUBF.TO NBI Unconstrained Fixed Income ETF | 4.56% | 4.45% | 4.35% | 3.99% | 11.20% | 4.23% | 1.72% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HAF.TO vs. NUBF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAF.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.04%, which is greater than NUBF.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAF.TO and NUBF.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAF.TO | NUBF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.04% | -16.37% | -11.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.87% | -4.66% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.30% | -12.37% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -3.32% | +1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -3.33% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 1.10% | +0.66% |
Volatility
HAF.TO vs. NUBF.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Active Global Fixed Income ETF (HAF.TO) is 2.32%, while NBI Unconstrained Fixed Income ETF (NUBF.TO) has a volatility of 3.01%. This indicates that HAF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUBF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HAF.TO | NUBF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.32% | 3.01% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.24% | 4.69% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.18% | 6.01% | +1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.18% | 7.00% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.13% | 11.47% | -0.34% |