CAGG.TO vs. HBB.TO
CAGG.TO (CI Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF) and HBB.TO (Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF) are both Total Bond Market funds. Over the past 5 years, CAGG.TO returned 0.90%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for HBB.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAGG.TO vs. HBB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAGG.TO achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly higher than HBB.TO's 1.92% return.
CAGG.TO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 3.60%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- —
HBB.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 2.64%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.28%
CAGG.TO vs. HBB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAGG.TO CI Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 2.25% | 2.45% | 4.41% | 7.28% | -11.36% | -3.39% | 7.32% | 9.39% | 0.30% | -0.53% |
HBB.TO Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF | 1.92% | 1.84% | 3.96% | 5.76% | -11.94% | -2.35% | 8.33% | 5.81% | 1.19% | -1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAGG.TO and HBB.TO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, CAGG.TO and HBB.TO have become more correlated (0.65) than their long-term average of 0.42, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAGG.TO vs. HBB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CAGG.TO
HBB.TO
CAGG.TO vs. HBB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAGG.TO) and Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAGG.TO | HBB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.11 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 0.95 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.11 | 2.26 | +0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAGG.TO vs. HBB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, roughly equal to the maximum HBB.TO drawdown of -18.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAGG.TO and HBB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAGG.TO | HBB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.77% | -18.23% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -2.78% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.76% | -5.56% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.68% | -16.19% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -2.55% | +2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.50% | -4.57% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 1.23% | -0.07% |
Volatility
CAGG.TO vs. HBB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAGG.TO) is 0.89%, while Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF (HBB.TO) has a volatility of 1.12%. This indicates that CAGG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAGG.TO | HBB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 1.12% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.14% | 3.38% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23% | 4.47% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.19% | 6.55% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 7.09% | -0.05% |
Dividends
CAGG.TO vs. HBB.TO - Dividend Comparison
CAGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while HBB.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAGG.TO CI Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.52% | 3.36% | 2.82% | 3.25% | 4.11% | 2.42% | 2.77% | 3.00% | 2.74% | 1.51% |
HBB.TO Global X Canadian Select Universe Bond Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAGG.TO and HBB.TO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: CI and Global X.
Find the right allocation for CAGG.TO and HBB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer