PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HABYX vs. MDVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HABYX vs. MDVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Hartford Total Return Bond Fund (HABYX) and MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HABYX achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than MDVAX's 2.59% return. Over the past 10 years, HABYX has outperformed MDVAX with an annualized return of 2.40%, while MDVAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.22% annualized return.


HABYX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.58%
YTD
0.51%
6M
0.33%
1Y
6.00%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
0.55%
10Y*
2.40%

MDVAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.96%
YTD
2.59%
6M
2.58%
1Y
8.43%
3Y*
5.96%
5Y*
0.38%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HABYX vs. MDVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HABYX
The Hartford Total Return Bond Fund
0.51%7.25%2.41%6.96%-14.02%-1.08%9.29%10.62%-0.73%5.26%
MDVAX
MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund
2.59%8.40%2.47%5.81%-17.01%1.95%8.08%10.12%-1.55%4.52%

Correlation

The correlation between HABYX and MDVAX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 1999

0.89

The correlation between HABYX and MDVAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HABYX vs. MDVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HABYX
HABYX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
HABYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HABYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
HABYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
HABYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
HABYX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

MDVAX
MDVAX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MDVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
MDVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HABYX vs. MDVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Hartford Total Return Bond Fund (HABYX) and MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HABYXMDVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.53

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

3.82

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.79

16.10

-10.31

HABYX vs. MDVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HABYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the MDVAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HABYX and MDVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HABYXMDVAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.58

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.06

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.42

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.71

+0.34

Drawdowns

HABYX vs. MDVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HABYX drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, smaller than the maximum MDVAX drawdown of -23.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HABYX and MDVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HABYXMDVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.42%

-23.02%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.06%

-2.21%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.50%

-5.44%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.38%

-23.02%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.42%

-23.02%

+3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-3.38%

+2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-3.47%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

0.52%

+0.50%

Volatility

HABYX vs. MDVAX - Volatility Comparison

The Hartford Total Return Bond Fund (HABYX) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund (MDVAX) at 0.95%. This indicates that HABYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HABYXMDVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

0.95%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

2.18%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11%

3.29%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.04%

6.46%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.06%

5.27%

-0.21%

HABYX vs. MDVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HABYX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MDVAX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

HABYX vs. MDVAX - Dividend Comparison

HABYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than MDVAX's 3.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HABYX
The Hartford Total Return Bond Fund
4.54%4.56%4.39%3.99%3.10%3.96%3.19%3.76%4.08%3.89%3.10%2.94%
MDVAX
MassMutual Diversified Bond Fund
3.99%3.91%2.45%4.87%3.76%4.06%7.20%2.90%2.86%2.64%2.11%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


HABYX and MDVAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HABYX has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to MDVAX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HABYX dropped -19.42% vs MDVAX's -23.02%.

MDVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HABYX and MDVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer