HABDX vs. TGLMX
HABDX (Harbor Core Plus Fund) and TGLMX (TCW Total Return Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, HABDX returned 2.01%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for TGLMX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HABDX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for TGLMX.
Performance
HABDX vs. TGLMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HABDX achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than TGLMX's 0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, HABDX has outperformed TGLMX with an annualized return of 2.01%, while TGLMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.31% annualized return.
HABDX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- 2.46%
- 3Y*
- 4.42%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- 2.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.73%
TGLMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- 1.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
HABDX vs. TGLMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HABDX Harbor Core Plus Fund | -0.02% | 7.28% | 2.56% | 6.70% | -13.23% | -0.64% | 8.88% | 8.42% | -0.20% | 4.89% |
TGLMX TCW Total Return Bond Fund | 0.59% | 8.99% | 1.82% | 5.05% | -16.59% | -1.05% | 8.32% | 7.28% | 0.80% | 3.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between HABDX and TGLMX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1994 | 0.78 |
The correlation between HABDX and TGLMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HABDX vs. TGLMX — Risk / Return Rank
HABDX
TGLMX
HABDX vs. TGLMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Core Plus Fund (HABDX) and TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HABDX | TGLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.21 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 1.84 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.17 | 4.83 | -1.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HABDX vs. TGLMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HABDX drawdown since its inception was -17.94%, smaller than the maximum TGLMX drawdown of -22.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HABDX and TGLMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HABDX | TGLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.94% | -22.26% | +4.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -2.63% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.07% | -7.20% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.94% | -22.17% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.94% | -22.26% | +4.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -3.36% | +1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -3.79% | +1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.06% | 1.00% | +0.06% |
Volatility
HABDX vs. TGLMX - Volatility Comparison
Harbor Core Plus Fund (HABDX) and TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX) have volatilities of 1.03% and 1.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HABDX | TGLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 1.03% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.85% | 3.22% | -0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.68% | 4.16% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.69% | 7.06% | -1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.84% | 5.60% | -0.76% |
HABDX vs. TGLMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HABDX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than TGLMX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
HABDX vs. TGLMX - Dividend Comparison
HABDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than TGLMX's 6.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HABDX Harbor Core Plus Fund | 4.41% | 4.65% | 4.46% | 4.24% | 3.41% | 3.12% | 3.27% | 3.19% | 3.08% | 3.41% | 3.86% | 5.40% |
TGLMX TCW Total Return Bond Fund | 6.07% | 7.19% | 6.52% | 6.13% | 3.27% | 2.08% | 3.37% | 4.07% | 3.55% | 2.89% | 4.13% | 2.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, HABDX and TGLMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TGLMX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to HABDX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HABDX dropped -17.94% vs TGLMX's -22.26%.
TGLMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HABDX and TGLMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer