HAB.TO vs. XIGS.TO
HAB.TO (Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF) and XIGS.TO (iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Corporate Bonds funds. HAB.TO is actively managed, while XIGS.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HAB.TO returned 1.98%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for XIGS.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HAB.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAB.TO achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly higher than XIGS.TO's -0.01% return.
HAB.TO
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 4.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- 2.89%
XIGS.TO
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 2.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
HAB.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAB.TO Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF | 0.81% | 4.13% | 7.98% | 7.30% | -9.51% | 0.87% |
XIGS.TO iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -0.01% | 4.82% | 3.76% | 5.39% | -5.89% | -0.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAB.TO and XIGS.TO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2021 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAB.TO vs. XIGS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HAB.TO
XIGS.TO
HAB.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF (HAB.TO) and iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAB.TO | XIGS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 1.39 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 3.93 | +0.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAB.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAB.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, which is greater than XIGS.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAB.TO and XIGS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAB.TO | XIGS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.78% | -10.12% | -13.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | -1.60% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.28% | -1.60% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.20% | -10.12% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -0.73% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.58% | -2.87% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.56% | +0.38% |
Volatility
HAB.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF (HAB.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO) at 0.74%. This indicates that HAB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIGS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAB.TO | XIGS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 0.74% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.29% | 1.73% | +1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.53% | 2.17% | +2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.49% | 3.30% | +3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.84% | 3.30% | +4.54% |
Dividends
HAB.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Dividend Comparison
HAB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than XIGS.TO's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAB.TO Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.05% | 3.70% | 3.95% | 3.96% | 2.92% | 2.95% | 2.99% | 3.23% | 3.21% | 3.39% | 3.35% |
XIGS.TO iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 4.54% | 4.10% | 3.71% | 3.03% | 1.75% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAB.TO and XIGS.TO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares.
Find the right allocation for HAB.TO and XIGS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer