PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HAB.TO vs. QQCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HAB.TO vs. QQCC.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

HAB.TO (Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF) and QQCC.TO (Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAB.TO is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while QQCC.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Global X. Over the past 10 years, HAB.TO returned 2.89%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for QQCC.TO. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

HAB.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF (HAB.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAB.TO achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than QQCC.TO's 15.96% return. Over the past 10 years, HAB.TO has outperformed QQCC.TO with an annualized return of 2.89%, while QQCC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 0.84% annualized return.

HAB.TO

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.94%
6M
0.32%
YTD
0.81%
1Y
4.46%
3Y*
6.05%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
2.89%

QQCC.TO

1D
-0.42%
1M
-1.92%
6M
13.52%
YTD
15.96%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
21.92%
5Y*
0.37%
10Y*
0.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAB.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAB.TO
Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF		0.81%4.13%7.98%7.30%-9.51%-1.26%8.46%7.77%0.46%4.11%
QQCC.TO
Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF		15.96%11.64%33.42%35.92%-55.98%5.24%-6.26%12.55%-18.79%15.14%

Correlation

The correlation between HAB.TO and QQCC.TO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2011

-0.06

The correlation between HAB.TO and QQCC.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF

Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF

Often compared with QQCC.TO:
QQCC.TO vs. QQCL.TOQQCC.TO vs. QQC.TOQQCC.TO vs. QQQIQQCC.TO vs. QQQQQCC.TO vs. XQQ.TOQQCC.TO vs. NVDA.TOQQCC.TO vs. JEPQ.TO

Return for Risk

HAB.TO vs. QQCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HAB.TO
HAB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HAB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
HAB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO
QQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAB.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF (HAB.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

HAB.TOQQCC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.99
1.86

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.47
2.52

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.34

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

3.47

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.78

11.96

-7.19

HAB.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAB.TO and QQCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HAB.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAB.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.78%, smaller than the maximum QQCC.TO drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAB.TO and QQCC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HAB.TOQQCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.78%

-67.77%

+43.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-8.15%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.28%

-22.24%

+18.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.20%

-59.13%

+44.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.78%

-62.91%

+39.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-23.27%

+21.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.58%

-28.24%

+25.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

2.36%

-1.42%

Volatility

HAB.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF (HAB.TO) is 1.34%, while Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that HAB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HAB.TOQQCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

6.40%

-5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.29%

12.82%

-9.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.53%

15.19%

-10.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.49%

28.46%

-21.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.84%

23.33%

-15.49%

Dividends

HAB.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HAB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than QQCC.TO's 10.73% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HAB.TO
Global X Active Corporate Bond ETF		4.12%4.05%3.70%3.95%3.96%2.92%2.95%2.99%3.23%3.21%3.39%3.35%
QQCC.TO
Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF		10.73%11.27%9.84%11.79%11.06%2.58%2.92%3.14%3.96%3.00%3.36%4.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

HAB.TO and QQCC.TO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAB.TO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while QQCC.TO is Nasdaq-100.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAB.TO and QQCC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer