PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H50E.L vs. HUKX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H50E.L vs. HUKX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (H50E.L) and HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H50E.L achieves a 6.58% return, which is significantly higher than HUKX.L's 5.71% return. Over the past 10 years, H50E.L has outperformed HUKX.L with an annualized return of 11.61%, while HUKX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.07% annualized return.


H50E.L

1D
0.97%
1M
5.00%
YTD
6.58%
6M
7.69%
1Y
18.97%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
11.61%

HUKX.L

1D
0.29%
1M
1.39%
YTD
5.71%
6M
8.18%
1Y
20.97%
3Y*
14.79%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
9.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H50E.L vs. HUKX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
H50E.L
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
6.58%28.02%6.20%20.06%-3.33%15.58%3.30%21.72%-10.53%14.39%
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP
5.71%26.20%9.58%7.36%5.07%17.54%-11.64%17.42%-8.67%12.39%

Correlation

The correlation between H50E.L and HUKX.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2009

0.75

The correlation between H50E.L and HUKX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.77 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

H50E.L vs. HUKX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
H50E.L
HUKX.L

Financial Services

24.8%
26.2%

Industrials

21.5%
13.0%

Technology

17.9%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
13.7%

Healthcare

5.2%
12.9%

Energy

5.0%
10.7%

Utilities

4.6%
4.8%

Basic Materials

3.5%
8.5%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.3%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Financial Services

H50E.L
24.8%
HUKX.L
26.2%

Industrials

H50E.L
21.5%
HUKX.L
13.0%

Technology

H50E.L
17.9%
HUKX.L
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

H50E.L
9.7%
HUKX.L
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

H50E.L
5.4%
HUKX.L
13.7%

Healthcare

H50E.L
5.2%
HUKX.L
12.9%

Energy

H50E.L
5.0%
HUKX.L
10.7%

Utilities

H50E.L
4.6%
HUKX.L
4.8%

Basic Materials

H50E.L
3.5%
HUKX.L
8.5%

Communication Services

H50E.L
2.4%
HUKX.L
2.3%

Real Estate

H50E.L

-

HUKX.L
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H50E.L vs. HUKX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H50E.L
H50E.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
H50E.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H50E.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
H50E.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
H50E.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
H50E.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

HUKX.L
HUKX.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HUKX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H50E.L vs. HUKX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (H50E.L) and HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H50E.LHUKX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.36

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.38

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

8.21

-2.68

H50E.L vs. HUKX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H50E.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the HUKX.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H50E.L and HUKX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H50E.LHUKX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.93

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.94

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.61

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.53

-0.14

Drawdowns

H50E.L vs. HUKX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H50E.L drawdown since its inception was -34.68%, roughly equal to the maximum HUKX.L drawdown of -34.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H50E.L and HUKX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H50E.LHUKX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.68%

-34.22%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.49%

-8.78%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.20%

-12.95%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.72%

-12.95%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.50%

-34.22%

+2.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-3.87%

+3.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.22%

-4.37%

-2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

2.55%

+0.88%

Volatility

H50E.L vs. HUKX.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (H50E.L) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (HUKX.L) at 3.90%. This indicates that H50E.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUKX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H50E.LHUKX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

3.90%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

9.43%

+2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.11%

10.82%

+4.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

12.65%

+4.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

14.96%

+3.03%

H50E.L vs. HUKX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

H50E.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than HUKX.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

H50E.L vs. HUKX.L - Dividend Comparison

H50E.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than HUKX.L's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H50E.L
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
2.45%2.46%2.98%2.92%2.77%2.01%2.05%3.04%3.50%2.76%2.79%2.63%
HUKX.L
HSBC FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP
2.85%2.95%3.74%3.50%3.63%3.19%4.04%4.31%4.35%3.79%3.49%3.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


H50E.L and HUKX.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HUKX.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HUKX.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for H50E.L.

H50E.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while HUKX.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for H50E.L and 0.07% for HUKX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H50E.L and HUKX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer