PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4ZX.DE vs. H41E.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H4ZX.DE vs. H41E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD (H4ZX.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H41E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZX.DE achieves a -10.21% return, which is significantly lower than H41E.DE's 39.52% return.


H4ZX.DE

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.65%
YTD
-10.21%
6M
-11.15%
1Y
-6.78%
3Y*
6.77%
5Y*
-8.49%
10Y*

H41E.DE

1D
-1.46%
1M
11.44%
YTD
39.52%
6M
42.99%
1Y
69.89%
3Y*
27.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4ZX.DE vs. H41E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
H4ZX.DE
HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD
-10.21%10.69%28.06%-11.53%-5.89%
H41E.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
39.52%22.02%17.74%11.43%-2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZX.DE and H41E.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2022

0.67

The correlation between H4ZX.DE and H41E.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H4ZX.DE vs. H41E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZX.DE
H4ZX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
H4ZX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

H41E.DE
H41E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
H41E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H41E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
H41E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
H41E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
H41E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZX.DE vs. H41E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD (H4ZX.DE) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H41E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H4ZX.DEH41E.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.69

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

7.09

-7.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.41

25.00

-25.41

H4ZX.DE vs. H41E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZX.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the H41E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZX.DE and H41E.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H4ZX.DEH41E.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

3.91

-4.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.20

1.56

-1.76

Drawdowns

H4ZX.DE vs. H41E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZX.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.32%, which is greater than H41E.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZX.DE and H41E.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H4ZX.DEH41E.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.32%

-20.92%

-48.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.08%

-9.80%

-20.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.31%

-20.92%

-12.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.22%

-3.33%

-48.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.50%

-3.10%

-46.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.57%

2.79%

+13.78%

Volatility

H4ZX.DE vs. H41E.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD (H4ZX.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.02% compared to HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets Value ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H41E.DE) at 7.97%. This indicates that H4ZX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than H41E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H4ZX.DEH41E.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.02%

7.97%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.64%

14.66%

+3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.17%

17.80%

+8.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.84%

16.06%

+21.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.65%

16.06%

+21.59%

H4ZX.DE vs. H41E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZX.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than H41E.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

H4ZX.DE vs. H41E.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither H4ZX.DE nor H41E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


H4ZX.DE and H41E.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H41E.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H41E.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for H4ZX.DE.

H4ZX.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while H41E.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. H4ZX.DE tracks Hang Seng TECH, while H41E.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Value SRI ESG Target Select. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for H4ZX.DE and 0.35% for H41E.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H4ZX.DE and H41E.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer