PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZN.DE) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with H4ZN.DE having a 11.38% return and H4ZY.DE slightly lower at 10.90%.


H4ZN.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
4.34%
YTD
11.38%
6M
10.80%
1Y
25.53%
3Y*
18.87%
5Y*
10Y*

H4ZY.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
3.67%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.95%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
H4ZN.DE
HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.38%4.72%32.33%22.56%-5.90%
H4ZY.DE
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.90%7.98%25.90%20.32%-4.03%

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZN.DE and H4ZY.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022

0.97

The correlation between H4ZN.DE and H4ZY.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZN.DE
H4ZN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
H4ZN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZY.DE
H4ZY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
H4ZY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZN.DE) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H4ZN.DEH4ZY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.40

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

3.64

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.69

14.48

-1.79

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the H4ZY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZN.DE and H4ZY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H4ZN.DEH4ZY.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.15

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

1.12

-0.03

Drawdowns

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZN.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, which is greater than H4ZY.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZN.DE and H4ZY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H4ZN.DEH4ZY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.40%

-21.94%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-6.55%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.40%

-21.94%

-1.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.32%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-3.60%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.65%

+0.36%

Volatility

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZN.DE) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZY.DE) have volatilities of 2.66% and 2.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H4ZN.DEH4ZY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.62%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.63%

7.66%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.60%

11.09%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

13.49%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.48%

13.49%

+0.99%

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZN.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than H4ZY.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

H4ZN.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither H4ZN.DE nor H4ZY.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, H4ZN.DE and H4ZY.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, H4ZN.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZN.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for H4ZY.DE.

H4ZN.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while H4ZY.DE is Global Equities. H4ZN.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while H4ZY.DE tracks MSCI World. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for H4ZN.DE and 0.15% for H4ZY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H4ZN.DE and H4ZY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer