PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4ZL.DE vs. H4ZP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

H4ZL.DE vs. H4ZP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (H4ZP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

H4ZL.DE vs. H4ZP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
H4ZL.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD
2.63%-4.65%2.27%6.12%-20.22%36.90%-16.99%23.91%-0.81%-2.27%
H4ZP.DE
HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD
-6.05%16.54%28.55%-14.47%-15.34%-16.86%15.20%26.76%-16.09%35.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZL.DE achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly higher than H4ZP.DE's -6.05% return. Over the past 10 years, H4ZL.DE has underperformed H4ZP.DE with an annualized return of 2.17%, while H4ZP.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 4.92% annualized return.


H4ZL.DE

1D
0.90%
1M
-6.17%
YTD
2.63%
6M
1.01%
1Y
-0.64%
3Y*
2.60%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
2.17%

H4ZP.DE

1D
0.94%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
-6.05%
6M
-12.81%
1Y
-1.98%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
-4.67%
10Y*
4.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


H4ZL.DE vs. H4ZP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZL.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than H4ZP.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

H4ZL.DE vs. H4ZP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZL.DE
H4ZL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZP.DE
H4ZP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
H4ZP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZL.DE vs. H4ZP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (H4ZP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H4ZL.DEH4ZP.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.04

-0.09

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.04

0.02

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.00

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

-0.04

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.11

-0.11

0.00

H4ZL.DE vs. H4ZP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is higher than the H4ZP.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZL.DE and H4ZP.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H4ZL.DEH4ZP.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

-0.09

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

-0.17

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.19

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.19

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZL.DE and H4ZP.DE is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

H4ZL.DE vs. H4ZP.DE - Dividend Comparison

H4ZL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H4ZP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H4ZL.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.63%3.62%2.19%3.13%2.95%3.29%3.08%2.96%2.67%
H4ZP.DE
HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD
2.13%2.39%3.10%2.10%1.97%1.28%0.96%1.57%1.40%0.78%1.97%2.89%

Drawdowns

H4ZL.DE vs. H4ZP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZL.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, smaller than the maximum H4ZP.DE drawdown of -55.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZL.DE and H4ZP.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


H4ZL.DEH4ZP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.97%

-55.74%

+13.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.13%

-16.22%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.45%

-49.75%

+19.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.97%

-55.74%

+13.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.80%

-30.82%

+14.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.77%

-22.98%

+12.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

6.57%

-3.57%

Volatility

H4ZL.DE vs. H4ZP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) is 4.34%, while HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (H4ZP.DE) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that H4ZL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4ZP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


H4ZL.DEH4ZP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

6.07%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.99%

13.13%

-5.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

21.48%

-6.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.67%

27.62%

-12.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.28%

25.24%

-8.96%