H4ZP.DE vs. H4Z6.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (H4ZP.DE) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE).
H4ZP.DE and H4Z6.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. H4ZP.DE is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China. It was launched on Jan 26, 2011. H4Z6.DE is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China. It was launched on Jul 12, 2022. Both H4ZP.DE and H4Z6.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
H4ZP.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
H4ZP.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H4ZP.DE HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD | -6.41% | 16.54% | 28.55% | -14.47% | -10.35% |
H4Z6.DE HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -6.39% | 16.48% | 27.04% | -14.63% | -10.19% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with H4ZP.DE having a -6.41% return and H4Z6.DE slightly higher at -6.39%.
H4ZP.DE
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- -6.41%
- 6M
- -14.69%
- 1Y
- -1.09%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- -4.75%
- 10Y*
- 4.88%
H4Z6.DE
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 6M
- -14.69%
- 1Y
- -0.94%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
H4ZP.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both H4ZP.DE and H4Z6.DE have an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Return for Risk
H4ZP.DE vs. H4Z6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
H4ZP.DE
H4Z6.DE
H4ZP.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (H4ZP.DE) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| H4ZP.DE | H4Z6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | -0.04 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.08 | 0.09 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 0.33 | +0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| H4ZP.DE | H4Z6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 | -0.04 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.06 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between H4ZP.DE and H4Z6.DE is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
H4ZP.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Dividend Comparison
H4ZP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, while H4Z6.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H4ZP.DE HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD | 2.13% | 2.39% | 3.10% | 2.10% | 1.97% | 1.28% | 0.96% | 1.57% | 1.40% | 0.78% | 1.97% | 2.89% |
H4Z6.DE HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
H4ZP.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum H4ZP.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.74%, which is greater than H4Z6.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZP.DE and H4Z6.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| H4ZP.DE | H4Z6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.74% | -33.47% | -22.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.67% | -15.70% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.09% | -14.69% | -16.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.98% | -13.93% | -9.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.28% | 6.31% | -0.03% |
Volatility
H4ZP.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Volatility Comparison
HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (H4ZP.DE) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE) have volatilities of 6.05% and 6.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| H4ZP.DE | H4Z6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 6.10% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.12% | 13.41% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.47% | 21.47% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.61% | 25.46% | +2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.24% | 25.46% | -0.22% |