H4ZL.DE vs. TRET.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE).

H4ZL.DE and TRET.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. H4ZL.DE is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. It was launched on Jun 20, 2011. TRET.DE is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the GPR Global 100. It was launched on Apr 14, 2011. Both H4ZL.DE and TRET.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

H4ZL.DE vs. TRET.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

H4ZL.DE vs. TRET.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
H4ZL.DE HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD	2.63%	-4.65%	2.27%	6.12%	-20.22%	36.90%	-16.99%	23.91%	-6.30%
TRET.DE VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	2.73%	1.87%	6.86%	9.89%	-21.28%	40.76%	-15.21%	22.15%	-7.54%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with H4ZL.DE having a 2.63% return and TRET.DE slightly higher at 2.73%.

H4ZL.DE

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -6.17%
• YTD: 2.63%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: -0.64%
• 3Y*: 2.60%
• 5Y*: 0.73%
• 10Y*: 2.17%

TRET.DE

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: -6.49%
• YTD: 2.73%
• 6M: 2.30%
• 1Y: 2.22%
• 3Y*: 7.70%
• 5Y*: 4.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4ZL.DE vs. TRET.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZL.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than TRET.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

TRET.DE

VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF

H4ZL.DE

HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD

Return for Risk

H4ZL.DE vs. TRET.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZL.DE

H4ZL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 10
H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
H4ZL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
H4ZL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 10
H4ZL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
H4ZL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 10

TRET.DE

TRET.DE Risk / Return Rank: 16
TRET.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
TRET.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
TRET.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 14
TRET.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
TRET.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZL.DE vs. TRET.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	H4ZL.DE	TRET.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.04	0.15	-0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.04	0.29	-0.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.04	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.03	0.27	-0.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.11	1.02	-1.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

H4ZL.DE vs. TRET.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the TRET.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZL.DE and TRET.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	H4ZL.DE	TRET.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04	0.15	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.27	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.20	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZL.DE and TRET.DE is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

H4ZL.DE vs. TRET.DE - Dividend Comparison

H4ZL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRET.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
H4ZL.DE HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.63%	3.62%	2.19%	3.13%	2.95%	3.29%	3.08%	2.96%	2.67%
TRET.DE VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF	3.48%	3.66%	3.44%	3.66%	4.69%	1.78%	4.45%	3.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

H4ZL.DE vs. TRET.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZL.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, roughly equal to the maximum TRET.DE drawdown of -41.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZL.DE and TRET.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	H4ZL.DE	TRET.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.97%	-41.75%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.13%	-13.30%	+0.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.45%	-30.36%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.80%	-6.80%	-10.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.77%	-12.41%	+1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	2.81%	+0.19%

Volatility

H4ZL.DE vs. TRET.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) is 4.34%, while VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that H4ZL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRET.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	H4ZL.DE	TRET.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	4.79%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.99%	8.59%	-0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.66%	15.20%	-0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.67%	15.12%	-0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.28%	17.94%	-1.66%