PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4ZJ.DE vs. IQQI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H4ZJ.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZJ.DE achieves a 12.98% return, which is significantly lower than IQQI.DE's 15.99% return. Over the past 10 years, H4ZJ.DE has outperformed IQQI.DE with an annualized return of 12.53%, while IQQI.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.79% annualized return.


H4ZJ.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
1.59%
6M
10.74%
YTD
12.98%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
12.21%
10Y*
12.53%

IQQI.DE

1D
-0.37%
1M
3.32%
6M
14.70%
YTD
15.99%
1Y
20.05%
3Y*
11.12%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*
6.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4ZJ.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
H4ZJ.DE
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD
12.98%7.95%25.68%20.11%-13.93%32.79%5.51%30.99%-4.99%7.69%
IQQI.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF
15.99%0.56%14.53%-3.18%-0.38%26.94%-10.82%27.73%2.23%0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZJ.DE and IQQI.DE is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2013

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between H4ZJ.DE and IQQI.DE has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H4ZJ.DE vs. IQQI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZJ.DE
H4ZJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
H4ZJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQI.DE
IQQI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IQQI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZJ.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


H4ZJ.DEIQQI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.32

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

4.15

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.44

10.37

+5.07

H4ZJ.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the IQQI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZJ.DE and IQQI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

H4ZJ.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.63%, smaller than the maximum IQQI.DE drawdown of -42.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZJ.DE and IQQI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H4ZJ.DEIQQI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.63%

-42.24%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-4.81%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.64%

-14.75%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.64%

-24.82%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.63%

-34.16%

+0.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.37%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.44%

-11.08%

+6.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.93%

-0.39%

Volatility

H4ZJ.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE) is 2.46%, while iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that H4ZJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H4ZJ.DEIQQI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

2.65%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.97%

8.63%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

10.84%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.16%

12.76%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.97%

14.25%

+0.72%

H4ZJ.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZJ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQI.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

H4ZJ.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Dividend Comparison

H4ZJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than IQQI.DE's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H4ZJ.DE
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD
1.14%1.25%1.20%1.38%1.58%1.07%1.36%1.64%1.86%1.67%1.65%1.63%
IQQI.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF
1.99%2.30%2.29%2.42%2.13%1.85%2.25%2.05%2.30%2.76%2.63%3.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


H4ZJ.DE and IQQI.DE have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H4ZJ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQI.DE.

H4ZJ.DE tracks MSCI World, while IQQI.DE tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for H4ZJ.DE and 0.65% for IQQI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H4ZJ.DE and IQQI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer