PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4ZJ.DE vs. HPAU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H4ZJ.DE vs. HPAU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE) and HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZJ.DE achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly lower than HPAU.DE's 11.46% return.


H4ZJ.DE

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.69%
YTD
10.86%
6M
10.96%
1Y
23.81%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
13.87%
10Y*
14.71%

HPAU.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
7.25%
YTD
11.46%
6M
10.58%
1Y
23.55%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4ZJ.DE vs. HPAU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
H4ZJ.DE
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD
10.86%8.00%26.94%22.28%-13.11%9.44%
HPAU.DE
HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.46%1.05%32.02%25.22%-19.66%12.01%

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZJ.DE and HPAU.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2021

0.95

The correlation between H4ZJ.DE and HPAU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H4ZJ.DE vs. HPAU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZJ.DE
H4ZJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
H4ZJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

HPAU.DE
HPAU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
HPAU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPAU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPAU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
HPAU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPAU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZJ.DE vs. HPAU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE) and HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H4ZJ.DEHPAU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.33

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

2.09

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.41

6.17

+8.24

H4ZJ.DE vs. HPAU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the HPAU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZJ.DE and HPAU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H4ZJ.DEHPAU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.81

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.67

+0.26

Drawdowns

H4ZJ.DE vs. HPAU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, which is greater than HPAU.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZJ.DE and HPAU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H4ZJ.DEHPAU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.60%

-25.26%

-8.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.59%

-11.34%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.65%

-25.26%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.34%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-7.13%

+3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

3.86%

-2.20%

Volatility

H4ZJ.DE vs. HPAU.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE) is 2.77%, while HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAU.DE) has a volatility of 3.54%. This indicates that H4ZJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HPAU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H4ZJ.DEHPAU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

3.54%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.73%

8.92%

-1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.24%

13.08%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

16.63%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.05%

16.63%

-1.58%

H4ZJ.DE vs. HPAU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZJ.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than HPAU.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

H4ZJ.DE vs. HPAU.DE - Dividend Comparison

H4ZJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while HPAU.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H4ZJ.DE
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD
1.16%1.28%2.06%3.02%2.65%2.73%3.30%4.02%4.71%3.58%4.02%3.46%
HPAU.DE
HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, H4ZJ.DE and HPAU.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, HPAU.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HPAU.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for H4ZJ.DE.

H4ZJ.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while HPAU.DE is Large Cap Blend Equities. H4ZJ.DE tracks MSCI World, while HPAU.DE tracks MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for H4ZJ.DE and 0.12% for HPAU.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H4ZJ.DE and HPAU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer