H4ZF.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

H4ZF.DE (HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD) and 4UBQ.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both S&P 500 funds - H4ZF.DE tracks the S&P 500 Index while 4UBQ.DE tracks the S&P 500 ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, H4ZF.DE returned 14.74%/yr vs 15.51%/yr for 4UBQ.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. H4ZF.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for 4UBQ.DE.

Performance

H4ZF.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (H4ZF.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with H4ZF.DE having a 11.35% return and 4UBQ.DE slightly lower at 11.15%.

H4ZF.DE

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 5.21%
• YTD: 11.35%
• 6M: 11.39%
• 1Y: 25.60%
• 3Y*: 18.88%
• 5Y*: 14.74%
• 10Y*: 15.80%

4UBQ.DE

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 4.20%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 28.46%
• 3Y*: 18.50%
• 5Y*: 15.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4ZF.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
H4ZF.DE HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD	11.35%	4.74%	32.24%	22.66%	-14.40%	40.68%	9.80%
4UBQ.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc	11.15%	5.39%	31.02%	24.03%	-13.92%	43.62%	8.66%

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZF.DE and 4UBQ.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2020	0.99

The correlation between H4ZF.DE and 4UBQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

H4ZF.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZF.DE

H4ZF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 69
H4ZF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
H4ZF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
H4ZF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 70
H4ZF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
H4ZF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 69

4UBQ.DE

4UBQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 79
4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
4UBQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
4UBQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 78
4UBQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
4UBQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZF.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (H4ZF.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	H4ZF.DE	4UBQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	2.47	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	3.36	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.46	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	4.10	-0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.69	15.73	-3.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

H4ZF.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZF.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the 4UBQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZF.DE and 4UBQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	H4ZF.DE	4UBQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	2.47	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96	1.00	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	1.11	-0.08

Drawdowns

H4ZF.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZF.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.82%, which is greater than 4UBQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZF.DE and 4UBQ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	H4ZF.DE	4UBQ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.82%	-23.35%	-10.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.16%	-6.93%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	-23.35%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.32%	-23.35%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.44%	0.00%	-0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.93%	-4.02%	+0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	1.81%	+0.20%

Volatility

H4ZF.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (H4ZF.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) have volatilities of 2.68% and 2.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	H4ZF.DE	4UBQ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.68%	2.81%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.59%	7.61%	-0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.61%	11.53%	+0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.20%	15.27%	-0.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.12%	15.39%	+0.73%

H4ZF.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZF.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than 4UBQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

H4ZF.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

H4ZF.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while 4UBQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
4UBQ.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
H4ZF.DE HSBC S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD	0.82%	0.95%	0.96%	1.19%	1.32%	0.91%	2.24%	2.98%	3.49%	3.23%	3.29%	4.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both H4ZF.DE and 4UBQ.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, H4ZF.DE and 4UBQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, H4ZF.DE or 4UBQ.DE?

On fees, H4ZF.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, H4ZF.DE or 4UBQ.DE?

H4ZF.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.

What is the main difference between H4ZF.DE and 4UBQ.DE?

H4ZF.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for H4ZF.DE and 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.