PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4ZE.DE vs. H4Z6.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H4ZE.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZE.DE) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZE.DE achieves a 7.42% return, which is significantly higher than H4Z6.DE's -6.53% return.


H4ZE.DE

1D
0.63%
1M
1.17%
YTD
7.42%
6M
9.80%
1Y
15.80%
3Y*
14.48%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
9.41%

H4Z6.DE

1D
-0.38%
1M
-3.35%
YTD
-6.53%
6M
-9.01%
1Y
2.78%
3Y*
7.78%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4ZE.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
H4ZE.DE
HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR
7.42%20.37%10.54%15.61%0.94%
H4Z6.DE
HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-6.53%16.48%27.04%-14.63%-10.19%

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZE.DE and H4Z6.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2022

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H4ZE.DE vs. H4Z6.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZE.DE
H4ZE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
H4ZE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

H4Z6.DE
H4Z6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
H4Z6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4Z6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4Z6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
H4Z6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4Z6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZE.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZE.DE) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H4ZE.DEH4Z6.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.04

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

0.18

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.20

0.38

+5.82

H4ZE.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the H4Z6.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZE.DE and H4Z6.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H4ZE.DEH4Z6.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

0.17

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.06

+0.44

Drawdowns

H4ZE.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZE.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.52%, which is greater than H4Z6.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZE.DE and H4Z6.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H4ZE.DEH4Z6.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.52%

-33.47%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-16.85%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

-24.47%

+7.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.04%

-14.82%

+12.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-13.91%

+8.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

8.17%

-5.60%

Volatility

H4ZE.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZE.DE) is 4.57%, while HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z6.DE) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that H4ZE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4Z6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H4ZE.DEH4Z6.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

7.23%

-2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

13.11%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

18.60%

-5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.28%

25.28%

-11.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.49%

25.28%

-9.79%

H4ZE.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZE.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than H4Z6.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

H4ZE.DE vs. H4Z6.DE - Dividend Comparison

H4ZE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, while H4Z6.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H4Z6.DE
HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
H4ZE.DE
HSBC MSCI Europe UCITS ETF EUR
2.43%2.58%5.12%2.81%3.03%2.09%2.15%2.91%3.35%2.75%2.88%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


H4ZE.DE and H4Z6.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H4ZE.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZE.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for H4Z6.DE.

H4ZE.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while H4Z6.DE is China Equities. H4ZE.DE tracks MSCI Europe, while H4Z6.DE tracks MSCI China. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for H4ZE.DE and 0.28% for H4Z6.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H4ZE.DE and H4Z6.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer