PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4ZA.DE vs. SXRY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H4ZA.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZA.DE achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than SXRY.DE's 17.22% return. Over the past 10 years, H4ZA.DE has underperformed SXRY.DE with an annualized return of 11.68%, while SXRY.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 16.60% annualized return.


H4ZA.DE

1D
-0.69%
1M
2.66%
YTD
9.45%
6M
10.39%
1Y
21.69%
3Y*
16.26%
5Y*
11.85%
10Y*
11.68%

SXRY.DE

1D
-0.85%
1M
3.87%
YTD
17.22%
6M
18.03%
1Y
36.08%
3Y*
29.01%
5Y*
20.33%
10Y*
16.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4ZA.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
9.45%22.26%11.06%22.59%-8.87%23.72%-2.73%30.04%-11.95%10.07%
SXRY.DE
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)
17.22%37.80%18.15%33.34%-9.13%26.71%-4.02%33.22%-14.32%16.72%

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZA.DE and SXRY.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2010

0.84

The correlation between H4ZA.DE and SXRY.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H4ZA.DE vs. SXRY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZA.DE
H4ZA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SXRY.DE
SXRY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SXRY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZA.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


H4ZA.DESXRY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.39

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

3.71

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.83

13.73

-6.90

H4ZA.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the SXRY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZA.DE and SXRY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

H4ZA.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZA.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.40%, smaller than the maximum SXRY.DE drawdown of -43.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZA.DE and SXRY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H4ZA.DESXRY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.40%

-43.59%

+5.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-9.69%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.39%

-17.61%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.26%

-25.00%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.40%

-40.81%

+2.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-2.82%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-11.60%

+4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.62%

+0.55%

Volatility

H4ZA.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) is 3.61%, while iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRY.DE) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that H4ZA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXRY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H4ZA.DESXRY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

4.01%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.23%

12.81%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.98%

15.91%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

18.29%

-0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

19.60%

-1.74%

H4ZA.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZA.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SXRY.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

H4ZA.DE vs. SXRY.DE - Dividend Comparison

H4ZA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, while SXRY.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
2.39%2.49%2.89%2.93%2.94%1.94%2.06%2.84%3.55%2.73%2.85%2.70%
SXRY.DE
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


H4ZA.DE and SXRY.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H4ZA.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZA.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for SXRY.DE.

H4ZA.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50, while SXRY.DE tracks FTSE MIB. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for H4ZA.DE and 0.33% for SXRY.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H4ZA.DE and SXRY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer