PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4Z7.DE vs. SEC0.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H4Z7.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE) and iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4Z7.DE achieves a 7.83% return, which is significantly lower than SEC0.DE's 98.10% return.


H4Z7.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
7.83%
6M
7.26%
1Y
9.73%
3Y*
6.21%
5Y*
10Y*

SEC0.DE

1D
-2.85%
1M
18.95%
YTD
98.10%
6M
98.14%
1Y
188.23%
3Y*
56.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4Z7.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
H4Z7.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
7.83%-1.78%5.80%7.39%-13.07%
SEC0.DE
iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
98.10%36.46%20.85%61.01%-12.59%

Correlation

The correlation between H4Z7.DE and SEC0.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2022

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H4Z7.DE vs. SEC0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4Z7.DE
H4Z7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
H4Z7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4Z7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4Z7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
H4Z7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4Z7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SEC0.DE
SEC0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
SEC0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEC0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEC0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SEC0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEC0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4Z7.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE) and iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H4Z7.DESEC0.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.75

-0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

14.81

-13.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.99

52.61

-48.62

H4Z7.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4Z7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the SEC0.DE Sharpe Ratio of 5.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4Z7.DE and SEC0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H4Z7.DESEC0.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

5.89

-5.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

1.17

-1.09

Drawdowns

H4Z7.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4Z7.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.78%, smaller than the maximum SEC0.DE drawdown of -39.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4Z7.DE and SEC0.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H4Z7.DESEC0.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.78%

-39.35%

+12.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.86%

-12.90%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.13%

-39.35%

+19.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-2.85%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.53%

-11.85%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

3.64%

-1.22%

Volatility

H4Z7.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z7.DE) is 2.87%, while iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SEC0.DE) has a volatility of 13.13%. This indicates that H4Z7.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEC0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H4Z7.DESEC0.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

13.13%

-10.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.56%

25.14%

-16.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.25%

32.42%

-21.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

29.95%

-15.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.42%

29.95%

-15.53%

H4Z7.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4Z7.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than SEC0.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

H4Z7.DE vs. SEC0.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither H4Z7.DE nor SEC0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


H4Z7.DE and SEC0.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H4Z7.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4Z7.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SEC0.DE.

H4Z7.DE is categorized as REIT, while SEC0.DE is Semiconductors. H4Z7.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed, while SEC0.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Screened Select Capped. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for H4Z7.DE and 0.35% for SEC0.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H4Z7.DE and SEC0.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer