H4Z3.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

H4Z3.DE (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and H4ZJ.DE (HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD) are both exchange-traded funds - H4Z3.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets, while H4ZJ.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, H4Z3.DE returned 20.42%/yr vs 18.46%/yr for H4ZJ.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

H4Z3.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4Z3.DE achieves a 27.75% return, which is significantly higher than H4ZJ.DE's 10.86% return.

H4Z3.DE

• 1D: -1.67%
• 1M: 3.67%
• YTD: 27.75%
• 6M: 28.22%
• 1Y: 49.05%
• 3Y*: 20.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

H4ZJ.DE

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 3.69%
• YTD: 10.86%
• 6M: 10.96%
• 1Y: 23.81%
• 3Y*: 18.46%
• 5Y*: 13.87%
• 10Y*: 14.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4Z3.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
H4Z3.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	27.75%	18.60%	13.73%	4.66%	-6.26%
H4ZJ.DE HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD	10.86%	8.00%	26.94%	22.28%	-4.13%

Correlation

The correlation between H4Z3.DE and H4ZJ.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022	0.61

The correlation between H4Z3.DE and H4ZJ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

H4Z3.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4Z3.DE

H4Z3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 86
H4Z3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
H4Z3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
H4Z3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 86
H4Z3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
H4Z3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 85

H4ZJ.DE

H4ZJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 70
H4ZJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
H4ZJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
H4ZJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 68
H4ZJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
H4ZJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4Z3.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	H4Z3.DE	H4ZJ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	2.13	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.82	2.96	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.40	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.77	3.61	+1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.12	14.41	+2.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

H4Z3.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4Z3.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the H4ZJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4Z3.DE and H4ZJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	H4Z3.DE	H4ZJ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	2.13	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.97	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.97	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.93	-0.02

Drawdowns

H4Z3.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4Z3.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.86%, smaller than the maximum H4ZJ.DE drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4Z3.DE and H4ZJ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	H4Z3.DE	H4ZJ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.86%	-33.60%	+14.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.47%	-6.59%	-3.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.86%	-21.65%	+2.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.65%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.73%	-0.34%	-2.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.95%	-4.02%	-0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	1.66%	+1.26%

Volatility

H4Z3.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4Z3.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (H4ZJ.DE) at 2.77%. This indicates that H4Z3.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than H4ZJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	H4Z3.DE	H4ZJ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.35%	2.77%	+4.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.91%	7.73%	+7.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.54%	11.24%	+6.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.77%	14.14%	+1.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.77%	15.05%	+0.72%

H4Z3.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both H4Z3.DE and H4ZJ.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

H4Z3.DE vs. H4ZJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

H4Z3.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H4ZJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
H4Z3.DE HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
H4ZJ.DE HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD	1.16%	1.28%	2.06%	3.02%	2.65%	2.73%	3.30%	4.02%	4.71%	3.58%	4.02%	3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both H4Z3.DE and H4ZJ.DE in my portfolio?

H4Z3.DE and H4ZJ.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, H4Z3.DE or H4ZJ.DE?

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, H4Z3.DE or H4ZJ.DE?

H4Z3.DE and H4ZJ.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

What is the main difference between H4Z3.DE and H4ZJ.DE?

H4Z3.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while H4ZJ.DE is Global Equities. H4Z3.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while H4ZJ.DE tracks MSCI World.