PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H411.DE vs. H4ZA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H411.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (H411.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H411.DE achieves a 37.68% return, which is significantly higher than H4ZA.DE's 7.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with H411.DE having a 11.02% annualized return and H4ZA.DE not far behind at 10.80%.


H411.DE

1D
-2.09%
1M
6.17%
YTD
37.68%
6M
38.70%
1Y
67.18%
3Y*
25.29%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
11.02%

H4ZA.DE

1D
0.77%
1M
1.94%
YTD
7.24%
6M
8.59%
1Y
15.63%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H411.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
H411.DE
HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD
37.68%25.21%18.89%-1.55%-16.07%-1.90%13.55%22.02%-11.68%24.72%
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
7.24%22.26%13.81%22.59%-8.87%23.72%-2.73%30.07%-11.96%10.07%

Correlation

The correlation between H411.DE and H4ZA.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013

0.59

The correlation between H411.DE and H4ZA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H411.DE vs. H4ZA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H411.DE
H411.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
H411.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H411.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
H411.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
H411.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
H411.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZA.DE
H4ZA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H411.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (H411.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H411.DEH4ZA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.18

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

1.43

+2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.66

4.85

+4.81

H411.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H411.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H411.DE and H4ZA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H411.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

0.98

+1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.69

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.59

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.41

+0.07

Drawdowns

H411.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H411.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.70%, roughly equal to the maximum H4ZA.DE drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H411.DE and H4ZA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H411.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.70%

-38.41%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.51%

-10.97%

-6.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.17%

-16.40%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.49%

-23.26%

-11.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.70%

-38.41%

-0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.25%

-0.50%

-2.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-7.84%

-5.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.07%

3.24%

+3.83%

Volatility

H411.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD (H411.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.34% compared to HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) at 4.95%. This indicates that H411.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than H4ZA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H411.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.34%

4.95%

+3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.24%

12.99%

+3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.65%

15.99%

+12.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.66%

17.50%

+4.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.44%

18.17%

+2.27%

H411.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H411.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZA.DE's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

H411.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Dividend Comparison

H411.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H4ZA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H411.DE
HSBC MSCI AC Far East ex Japan UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
2.44%2.49%5.35%2.93%2.94%1.94%2.06%2.84%3.55%2.73%2.85%2.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


H411.DE and H4ZA.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H4ZA.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZA.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for H411.DE.

H411.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while H4ZA.DE is Europe Equities. H411.DE tracks MSCI AC Far East ex Japan, while H4ZA.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for H411.DE and 0.05% for H4ZA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H411.DE and H4ZA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer