PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H410.DE vs. H4ZY.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H410.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZY.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H410.DE achieves a 27.49% return, which is significantly higher than H4ZY.DE's 10.90% return.


H410.DE

1D
-1.81%
1M
3.71%
YTD
27.49%
6M
27.95%
1Y
49.05%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
9.77%

H4ZY.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
3.67%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.95%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H410.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
H410.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD
27.49%18.61%13.89%4.66%-6.03%
H4ZY.DE
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
10.90%7.98%25.90%20.32%-4.03%

Correlation

The correlation between H410.DE and H4ZY.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2022

0.61

The correlation between H410.DE and H4ZY.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H410.DE vs. H4ZY.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H410.DE
H410.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
H410.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H410.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
H410.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
H410.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
H410.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZY.DE
H4ZY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
H4ZY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H410.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) and HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZY.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H410.DEH4ZY.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.40

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

3.64

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.19

14.48

+2.71

H410.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H410.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the H4ZY.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H410.DE and H4ZY.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H410.DEH4ZY.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

2.15

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

1.12

-0.71

Drawdowns

H410.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H410.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.25%, which is greater than H4ZY.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H410.DE and H4ZY.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H410.DEH4ZY.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.25%

-21.94%

-14.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-6.55%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.96%

-21.94%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

-0.32%

-2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.25%

-3.60%

-6.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

1.65%

+1.25%

Volatility

H410.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H4ZY.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that H410.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than H4ZY.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H410.DEH4ZY.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

2.62%

+4.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.96%

7.66%

+7.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

11.09%

+6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

13.49%

+3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.17%

13.49%

+4.68%

H410.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both H410.DE and H4ZY.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

H410.DE vs. H4ZY.DE - Dividend Comparison

H410.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while H4ZY.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H410.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD
1.60%2.00%2.40%2.58%3.11%2.00%1.69%2.03%2.20%1.62%1.71%2.28%
H4ZY.DE
HSBC MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


H410.DE and H4ZY.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H410.DE and H4ZY.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

H410.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while H4ZY.DE is Global Equities. H410.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while H4ZY.DE tracks MSCI World.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H410.DE and H4ZY.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer