PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H410.DE vs. H41G.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H410.DE vs. H41G.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) and HSBC MSCI World Small Cap ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H41G.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H410.DE achieves a 27.49% return, which is significantly higher than H41G.DE's 12.22% return.


H410.DE

1D
-1.81%
1M
3.71%
YTD
27.49%
6M
27.95%
1Y
49.05%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
9.77%

H41G.DE

1D
0.61%
1M
2.87%
YTD
12.22%
6M
13.07%
1Y
23.63%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H410.DE vs. H41G.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
H410.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD
27.49%18.61%13.89%4.66%5.66%
H41G.DE
HSBC MSCI World Small Cap ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.22%3.96%12.21%11.87%-2.26%

Correlation

The correlation between H410.DE and H41G.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2022

0.56

The correlation between H410.DE and H41G.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H410.DE vs. H41G.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H410.DE
H410.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
H410.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H410.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
H410.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
H410.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
H410.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

H41G.DE
H41G.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
H41G.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H41G.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
H41G.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
H41G.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
H41G.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H410.DE vs. H41G.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) and HSBC MSCI World Small Cap ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H41G.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H410.DEH41G.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.32

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

2.89

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.19

10.99

+6.20

H410.DE vs. H41G.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H410.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the H41G.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H410.DE and H41G.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H410.DEH41G.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

1.76

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.66

-0.25

Drawdowns

H410.DE vs. H41G.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H410.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.25%, which is greater than H41G.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H410.DE and H41G.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H410.DEH41G.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.25%

-24.84%

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-8.12%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.96%

-24.84%

+5.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.80%

0.00%

-2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.25%

-4.87%

-5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.14%

+0.76%

Volatility

H410.DE vs. H41G.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to HSBC MSCI World Small Cap ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (H41G.DE) at 3.35%. This indicates that H410.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than H41G.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H410.DEH41G.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

3.35%

+3.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.96%

9.50%

+5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

13.30%

+4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

15.71%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.17%

15.71%

+2.46%

H410.DE vs. H41G.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H410.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than H41G.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

H410.DE vs. H41G.DE - Dividend Comparison

H410.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while H41G.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H410.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD
1.60%2.00%2.40%2.58%3.11%2.00%1.69%2.03%2.20%1.62%1.71%2.28%
H41G.DE
HSBC MSCI World Small Cap ESG UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


H410.DE and H41G.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H410.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H410.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for H41G.DE.

H410.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while H41G.DE is Global Equities. H410.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while H41G.DE tracks MSCI World Small Cap SRI ESG Leaders Select. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for H410.DE and 0.25% for H41G.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H410.DE and H41G.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer