PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H410.DE vs. AE5A.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H410.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H410.DE achieves a 19.79% return, which is significantly lower than AE5A.DE's 21.78% return.


H410.DE

1D
-1.87%
1M
-8.04%
6M
12.07%
YTD
19.79%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*
8.22%

AE5A.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.37%
6M
14.19%
YTD
21.78%
1Y
36.37%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H410.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
H410.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD
19.79%18.65%13.95%3.65%
AE5A.DE
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist
21.78%19.26%14.36%4.85%

Correlation

The correlation between H410.DE and AE5A.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2023

0.98

The correlation between H410.DE and AE5A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H410.DE vs. AE5A.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H410.DE
H410.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
H410.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H410.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
H410.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
H410.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
H410.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

AE5A.DE
AE5A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AE5A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AE5A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H410.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


H410.DEAE5A.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.33

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.53

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.64

10.53

-0.89

H410.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H410.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the AE5A.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H410.DE and AE5A.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

H410.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H410.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.02%, which is greater than AE5A.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H410.DE and AE5A.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H410.DEAE5A.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.02%

-19.22%

-21.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-10.34%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

-19.22%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.71%

-9.27%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.30%

-3.10%

-10.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

3.46%

+0.07%

Volatility

H410.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (H410.DE) and Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist (AE5A.DE) have volatilities of 8.22% and 8.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H410.DEAE5A.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.22%

8.37%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.70%

17.75%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.15%

20.29%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.18%

16.63%

+0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

16.63%

+1.68%

H410.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H410.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than AE5A.DE's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

H410.DE vs. AE5A.DE - Dividend Comparison

H410.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than AE5A.DE's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AE5A.DE
Amundi Core MSCI Emerging Markets Swap UCITS ETF Dist
1.77%2.15%3.38%3.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
H410.DE
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD
1.71%2.00%2.40%2.59%3.11%2.00%1.69%2.03%2.20%1.62%1.71%2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, H410.DE and AE5A.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, AE5A.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AE5A.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for H410.DE.

H410.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while AE5A.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for H410.DE and 0.14% for AE5A.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H410.DE and AE5A.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer