GYLD vs. ORO
GYLD (Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF) and ORO (Arrow Valtoro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GYLD is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Yield, while ORO is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Funds. GYLD is passively managed, while ORO is actively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GYLD charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for ORO.
Performance
GYLD vs. ORO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GYLD achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than ORO's 7.13% return.
GYLD
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 10.25%
- 1Y
- 15.94%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
ORO
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -3.85%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GYLD vs. ORO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GYLD Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF | 7.91% | 4.14% |
ORO Arrow Valtoro ETF | 7.13% | -8.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between GYLD and ORO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GYLD vs. ORO — Risk / Return Rank
GYLD
ORO
GYLD vs. ORO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) and Arrow Valtoro ETF (ORO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GYLD | ORO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.19 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GYLD | ORO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | -0.17 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
GYLD vs. ORO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GYLD drawdown since its inception was -55.03%, which is greater than ORO's maximum drawdown of -12.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GYLD and ORO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GYLD | ORO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.03% | -12.46% | -42.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -6.56% | +4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.41% | -6.54% | -7.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.74% | — | — |
Volatility
GYLD vs. ORO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GYLD | ORO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 23.68% | -10.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.79% | 23.68% | -9.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 23.68% | -7.10% |
GYLD vs. ORO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GYLD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than ORO's 1.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
GYLD vs. ORO - Dividend Comparison
GYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, while ORO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GYLD Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF | 7.37% | 8.43% | 12.90% | 7.13% | 4.64% | 5.50% | 7.42% | 5.83% | 8.17% | 6.78% | 7.29% | 10.35% |
ORO Arrow Valtoro ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GYLD and ORO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GYLD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GYLD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for ORO.
GYLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.37%, compared with 0.00% for ORO.
GYLD is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ORO is Tactical Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GYLD and 1.25% for ORO.
Find the right allocation for GYLD and ORO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer