PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GYLD vs. EAOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GYLD vs. EAOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GYLD achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than EAOR's 7.50% return.


GYLD

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.76%
YTD
7.91%
6M
10.25%
1Y
15.94%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
4.68%

EAOR

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.41%
YTD
7.50%
6M
7.84%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
13.83%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GYLD vs. EAOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GYLD
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
7.91%19.85%3.83%10.36%-7.73%18.03%13.70%
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
7.50%15.59%10.69%14.96%-16.66%10.51%15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between GYLD and EAOR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020

0.42

The correlation between GYLD and EAOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GYLD vs. EAOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GYLD
EAOR

Real Estate

34.8%
1.2%

Energy

30.0%
2.3%

Financial Services

12.0%
10.3%

Basic Materials

7.5%
1.8%

Utilities

4.6%
1.7%

Industrials

4.3%
6.8%

Communication Services

2.7%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

2.5%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
2.8%

Healthcare

-

5.2%

Technology

-

22.3%

Real Estate

GYLD
34.8%
EAOR
1.2%

Energy

GYLD
30.0%
EAOR
2.3%

Financial Services

GYLD
12.0%
EAOR
10.3%

Basic Materials

GYLD
7.5%
EAOR
1.8%

Utilities

GYLD
4.6%
EAOR
1.7%

Industrials

GYLD
4.3%
EAOR
6.8%

Communication Services

GYLD
2.7%
EAOR
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GYLD
2.5%
EAOR
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

GYLD
1.6%
EAOR
2.8%

Healthcare

GYLD

-

EAOR
5.2%

Technology

GYLD

-

EAOR
22.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GYLD vs. EAOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GYLD
GYLD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
GYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOR
EAOR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
EAOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOR Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GYLD vs. EAOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) and iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GYLDEAORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.43

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

2.97

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.19

13.04

-3.85

GYLD vs. EAOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the EAOR Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GYLD and EAOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GYLDEAORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.30

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.61

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.87

-0.67

Drawdowns

GYLD vs. EAOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GYLD drawdown since its inception was -55.03%, which is greater than EAOR's maximum drawdown of -22.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GYLD and EAOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GYLDEAORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.03%

-22.91%

-32.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-6.62%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.37%

-10.28%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.24%

-22.91%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-0.65%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.41%

-5.05%

-9.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.50%

+0.24%

Volatility

GYLD vs. EAOR - Volatility Comparison

Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF (GYLD) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF (EAOR) at 2.79%. This indicates that GYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GYLDEAORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

2.79%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

6.90%

+2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

8.55%

+4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.79%

10.52%

+3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

10.39%

+6.19%

GYLD vs. EAOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

GYLD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOR's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

GYLD vs. EAOR - Dividend Comparison

GYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, more than EAOR's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EAOR
iShares ESG Aware Growth Allocation ETF
2.34%2.45%2.52%2.39%1.99%1.39%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GYLD
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
7.37%8.43%12.90%7.13%4.64%5.50%7.42%5.83%8.17%6.78%7.29%10.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


GYLD and EAOR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GYLD has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to EAOR (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GYLD dropped -55.03% vs EAOR's -22.91%.

On 5-year performance, EAOR leads with 6.41% vs 6.21% for GYLD. On fees, EAOR is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EAOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EAOR has performed better with a 6.41% return vs 6.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EAOR is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GYLD.

GYLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.37%, compared with 2.34% for EAOR.

GYLD tracks DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Yield, while EAOR tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Growth Allocation Index. They also come from different issuers: Arrow Funds and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GYLD and 0.18% for EAOR.

EAOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GYLD and EAOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer