PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXUS vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXUS vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF (GXUS) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXUS achieves a 16.77% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.70% return.


GXUS

1D
0.20%
1M
3.83%
YTD
16.77%
6M
17.26%
1Y
34.35%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
10Y*

SGOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.70%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
3.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXUS vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GXUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF
16.77%31.47%4.61%6.23%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.70%4.24%5.27%3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GXUS and SGOV is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2023

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXUS vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXUS
GXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXUS vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF (GXUS) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXUSSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-18.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-271.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

194.55

-193.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

396.11

-393.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.21

4,438.60

-4,427.39

GXUS vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXUS and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXUS vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXUS drawdown since its inception was -13.90%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXUS and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXUSSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.90%

-0.03%

-13.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-0.01%

-11.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.90%

-0.01%

-13.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-0.00%

-2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

0.00%

+3.07%

Volatility

GXUS vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF (GXUS) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.06%. This indicates that GXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXUSSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

0.06%

+6.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.30%

0.13%

+14.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.17%

0.19%

+16.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.45%

0.24%

+15.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.45%

0.24%

+15.21%

GXUS vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GXUS vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

GXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than SGOV's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GXUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Total International Equity ETF
2.16%2.66%2.87%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXUS and SGOV have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GXUS has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to SGOV (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXUS dropped -13.90% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

On 3-year performance, GXUS leads with 19.51% vs 4.68% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GXUS has performed better with a 19.51% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for GXUS.

SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 2.16% for GXUS.

GXUS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. GXUS tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap Index - Benchmark TR Net, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for GXUS and 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.38 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXUS and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer