PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPE vs. FENY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPE vs. FENY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPE achieves a 20.25% return, which is significantly lower than FENY's 21.34% return.


GXPE

1D
-1.80%
1M
-9.28%
YTD
20.25%
6M
21.31%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FENY

1D
-1.79%
1M
-9.60%
YTD
21.34%
6M
22.23%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
15.43%
5Y*
18.24%
10Y*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPE vs. FENY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GXPE
Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF
20.25%4.62%
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
21.34%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between GXPE and FENY is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.98

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPE vs. FENY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXPE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FENY
FENY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FENY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FENY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FENY Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FENY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FENY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPE vs. FENY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXPEFENYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.44

GXPE vs. FENY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXPE vs. FENY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPE drawdown since its inception was -14.89%, smaller than the maximum FENY drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPE and FENY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPEFENYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.89%

-74.35%

+59.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.64%

-14.09%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-23.06%

+19.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

Volatility

GXPE vs. FENY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPEFENYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.74%

20.72%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.74%

26.44%

-5.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.74%

29.81%

-9.07%

GXPE vs. FENY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FENY's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GXPE vs. FENY - Dividend Comparison

GXPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than FENY's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
2.62%3.18%3.05%3.33%3.33%3.69%4.60%6.43%3.21%2.94%2.29%3.05%
GXPE
Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF
1.00%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, GXPE and FENY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXPE.

FENY has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.00% for GXPE.

GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index, while FENY tracks MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPE and 0.08% for FENY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPE and FENY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer