PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPE vs. CRAK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPE vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GXPE having a 20.25% return and CRAK slightly lower at 19.69%.


GXPE

1D
-1.80%
1M
-9.28%
YTD
20.25%
6M
21.31%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRAK

1D
-0.97%
1M
-7.44%
YTD
19.69%
6M
19.24%
1Y
43.12%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
12.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPE vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GXPE
Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF
20.25%4.62%
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
19.69%11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between GXPE and CRAK is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPE vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXPE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CRAK
CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXPE vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXPECRAKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.50

GXPE vs. CRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXPE vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPE drawdown since its inception was -14.89%, smaller than the maximum CRAK drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPE and CRAK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPECRAKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.89%

-58.80%

+43.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.64%

-13.59%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.66%

-12.47%

+8.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

Volatility

GXPE vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPECRAKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.74%

19.14%

+1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.74%

20.68%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.74%

22.17%

-1.43%

GXPE vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXPE vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison

GXPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than CRAK's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF
1.68%2.02%5.60%3.65%3.08%2.40%2.64%1.49%2.42%1.66%3.42%0.47%
GXPE
Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF
1.00%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXPE and CRAK have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for CRAK.

CRAK has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.00% for GXPE.

GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index, while CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPE and 0.62% for CRAK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPE and CRAK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer