PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXLK.L vs. XNNS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXLK.L vs. XNNS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GXLK.L

1D
-2.05%
1M
14.24%
YTD
23.38%
6M
22.20%
1Y
53.75%
3Y*
26.51%
5Y*
10Y*

XNNS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXLK.L vs. XNNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GXLK.L
SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF
23.38%15.88%24.73%48.31%-9.91%
XNNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
-7.92%6.27%24.09%26.71%-12.09%

Correlation

The correlation between GXLK.L and XNNS.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2022

0.77

The correlation between GXLK.L and XNNS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXLK.L vs. XNNS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXLK.L
GXLK.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
GXLK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

XNNS.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXLK.L vs. XNNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Technology Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLK.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GXLK.LXNNS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.20

GXLK.L vs. XNNS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXLK.LXNNS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

Drawdowns

GXLK.L vs. XNNS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXLK.LXNNS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.54%

Volatility

GXLK.L vs. XNNS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXLK.LXNNS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.83%

GXLK.L vs. XNNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXLK.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XNNS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXLK.L vs. XNNS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GXLK.L nor XNNS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GXLK.L and XNNS.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXLK.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLK.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XNNS.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXLK.L and 0.35% for XNNS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXLK.L and XNNS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer