PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXLF.L vs. XWFS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GXLF.L vs. XWFS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLF.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GXLF.L vs. XWFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GXLF.L
SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF
-8.42%7.31%32.20%6.05%-1.25%
XWFS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C
-4.68%20.20%29.08%10.02%0.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXLF.L achieves a -8.42% return, which is significantly lower than XWFS.L's -4.68% return.


GXLF.L

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
-8.42%
6M
-4.93%
1Y
-1.90%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
10Y*

XWFS.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
-4.68%
6M
1.01%
1Y
11.13%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GXLF.L vs. XWFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXLF.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XWFS.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

GXLF.L vs. XWFS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXLF.L
GXLF.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GXLF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

XWFS.L
XWFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XWFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XWFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
XWFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XWFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XWFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXLF.L vs. XWFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLF.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GXLF.LXWFS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.11

0.68

-0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.03

1.00

-1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.14

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

1.70

-1.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.74

5.78

-5.04

GXLF.L vs. XWFS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXLF.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the XWFS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXLF.L and XWFS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXLF.LXWFS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

0.68

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.78

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between GXLF.L and XWFS.L is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GXLF.L vs. XWFS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GXLF.L nor XWFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GXLF.L vs. XWFS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXLF.L drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, which is greater than XWFS.L's maximum drawdown of -16.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLF.L and XWFS.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GXLF.LXWFS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.21%

-16.47%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-9.64%

-3.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.16%

-6.12%

-4.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-4.16%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.53%

2.84%

+1.69%

Volatility

GXLF.L vs. XWFS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLF.L) is 4.74%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that GXLF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XWFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GXLF.LXWFS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

5.26%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.84%

9.91%

+0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.70%

16.40%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.13%

16.18%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.13%

16.18%

+0.95%