PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXLF.L vs. WFIN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXLF.L vs. WFIN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLF.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD Acc (WFIN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GXLF.L is traded in GBP, while WFIN.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WFIN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXLF.L achieves a 3.49% return, which is significantly lower than WFIN.L's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, GXLF.L has underperformed WFIN.L with an annualized return of 9.90%, while WFIN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.


GXLF.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.52%
6M
5.78%
YTD
3.49%
1Y
10.02%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
4.60%
10Y*
9.90%

WFIN.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.02%
6M
9.23%
YTD
8.76%
1Y
20.40%
3Y*
23.63%
5Y*
15.27%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXLF.L vs. WFIN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GXLF.L
SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF
3.49%7.31%32.20%6.05%-26.15%34.39%-2.17%31.42%-13.35%21.63%
WFIN.L
State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD Acc
8.76%19.97%29.04%10.39%0.87%29.59%-5.81%20.19%-12.43%12.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GXLF.L and WFIN.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.68

The correlation between GXLF.L and WFIN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (10 years) to 0.84 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXLF.L vs. WFIN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXLF.L
GXLF.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GXLF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

WFIN.L
WFIN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
WFIN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFIN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFIN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
WFIN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFIN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXLF.L vs. WFIN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLF.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD Acc (WFIN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXLF.LWFIN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.26

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

2.15

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.82

6.83

-5.01

GXLF.L vs. WFIN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXLF.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the WFIN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXLF.L and WFIN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXLF.L vs. WFIN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXLF.L drawdown since its inception was -42.92%, smaller than the maximum WFIN.L drawdown of -61.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLF.L and WFIN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXLF.LWFIN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.92%

-61.54%

+18.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-9.90%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.21%

-16.14%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.50%

-16.17%

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.92%

-35.39%

-7.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.58%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.77%

-10.55%

-1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

3.12%

+2.41%

Volatility

GXLF.L vs. WFIN.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLF.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD Acc (WFIN.L) have volatilities of 3.64% and 3.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXLF.LWFIN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

3.67%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

11.66%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.37%

14.30%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.51%

16.58%

+3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.93%

18.14%

+4.79%

GXLF.L vs. WFIN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXLF.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WFIN.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXLF.L vs. WFIN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GXLF.L nor WFIN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GXLF.L and WFIN.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXLF.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLF.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WFIN.L.

GXLF.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while WFIN.L tracks State Street SPDR MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF USD Acc. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXLF.L and 0.30% for WFIN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXLF.L and WFIN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer