GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L
GXLF.L (SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF) and IUFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Financials Equities funds - GXLF.L tracks the MSCI World/Financials NR USD while IUFS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GXLF.L returned 15.45%/yr vs 15.54%/yr for IUFS.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GXLF.L is traded in GBP, while IUFS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUFS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GXLF.L having a -4.87% return and IUFS.L slightly higher at -4.67%.
GXLF.L
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- -4.87%
- 6M
- -2.66%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUFS.L
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- -4.67%
- 6M
- -2.72%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXLF.L SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF | -4.87% | 7.31% | 32.20% | 6.05% | -1.25% |
IUFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc | -4.67% | 6.85% | 32.50% | 6.52% | -1.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXLF.L and IUFS.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022 | 0.93 |
The correlation between GXLF.L and IUFS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L — Risk / Return Rank
GXLF.L
IUFS.L
GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLF.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GXLF.L | IUFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.06 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 0.34 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.84 | 0.82 | +0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXLF.L | IUFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 0.30 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.59 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXLF.L drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, smaller than the maximum IUFS.L drawdown of -35.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLF.L and IUFS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXLF.L | IUFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.21% | -35.96% | +17.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.80% | -13.28% | +0.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.21% | -18.90% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.67% | -6.64% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -6.09% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | 5.52% | -0.04% |
Volatility
GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLF.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXLF.L | IUFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 4.58% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | 11.57% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.08% | 15.11% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 18.53% | -1.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 20.96% | -3.97% |
GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GXLF.L and IUFS.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither GXLF.L nor IUFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, GXLF.L and IUFS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLF.L and IUFS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
GXLF.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while IUFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.
Find the right allocation for GXLF.L and IUFS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer