PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLF.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GXLF.L is traded in GBP, while IUFS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUFS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GXLF.L having a -4.87% return and IUFS.L slightly higher at -4.67%.


GXLF.L

1D
3.21%
1M
2.06%
YTD
-4.87%
6M
-2.66%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
10Y*

IUFS.L

1D
3.18%
1M
2.14%
YTD
-4.67%
6M
-2.72%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
15.54%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
13.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GXLF.L
SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF
-4.87%7.31%32.20%6.05%-1.25%
IUFS.L
iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
-4.67%6.85%32.50%6.52%-1.88%

Correlation

The correlation between GXLF.L and IUFS.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022

0.93

The correlation between GXLF.L and IUFS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXLF.L
GXLF.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
GXLF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXLF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXLF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GXLF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXLF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

IUFS.L
IUFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IUFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
IUFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLF.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GXLF.LIUFS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.06

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

0.34

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.84

0.82

+0.02

GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXLF.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is comparable to the IUFS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXLF.L and IUFS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GXLF.LIUFS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

0.30

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.59

-0.08

Drawdowns

GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXLF.L drawdown since its inception was -18.21%, smaller than the maximum IUFS.L drawdown of -35.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLF.L and IUFS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXLF.LIUFS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.21%

-35.96%

+17.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-13.28%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.21%

-18.90%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.67%

-6.64%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

-6.09%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

5.52%

-0.04%

Volatility

GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLF.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXLF.LIUFS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

4.58%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

11.57%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.08%

15.11%

-1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

18.53%

-1.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

20.96%

-3.97%

GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GXLF.L and IUFS.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GXLF.L vs. IUFS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GXLF.L nor IUFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, GXLF.L and IUFS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXLF.L and IUFS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

GXLF.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while IUFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXLF.L and IUFS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer