PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXDW vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXDW vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF (GXDW) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXDW achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -10.17% return.


GXDW

1D
-0.85%
1M
-12.11%
YTD
10.18%
6M
6.66%
1Y
5.63%
3Y*
2.16%
5Y*
-11.33%
10Y*

SHLD

1D
-1.15%
1M
-11.99%
YTD
-10.17%
6M
-12.31%
1Y
-0.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXDW vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
GXDW
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF
10.18%3.52%-3.55%-1.61%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-10.17%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GXDW and SHLD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXDW vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GXDW
GXDW Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
GXDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXDW Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
GXDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXDW Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GXDW vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF (GXDW) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GXDWSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.02

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

-0.01

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.53

-0.03

+0.55

GXDW vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GXDW Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GXDW and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXDW vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXDW drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than SHLD's maximum drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXDW and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXDWSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.81%

-25.40%

-42.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.65%

-25.40%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.45%

-25.40%

-31.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.17%

-3.55%

-39.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.67%

8.97%

+1.70%

Volatility

GXDW vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF (GXDW) has a higher volatility of 13.44% compared to Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) at 9.01%. This indicates that GXDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXDWSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.44%

9.01%

+4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.55%

20.22%

+2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.40%

24.85%

+3.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.19%

21.39%

+6.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.87%

21.39%

+8.48%

GXDW vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GXDW and SHLD have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

GXDW vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

GXDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than SHLD's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GXDW
Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF
1.27%1.40%1.08%1.99%1.48%1.56%0.48%0.31%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.61%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GXDW and SHLD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GXDW has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to SHLD (9.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GXDW dropped -67.81% vs SHLD's -25.40%.

On 1-year performance, GXDW leads with 5.63% vs -0.23% for SHLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, SHLD has been the lower-risk option at 9.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GXDW has performed better with a 5.63% return vs -0.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GXDW and SHLD have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

GXDW has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.61% for SHLD.

GXDW is categorized as Systematic Trend, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. GXDW tracks Nasdaq Dorsey Wright Thematic Rotation Total Return Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index.

GXDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.20 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXDW and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer