PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWX vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWX vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWX achieves a 11.79% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 36.47% return. Over the past 10 years, GWX has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 7.57%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.84% annualized return.


GWX

1D
-1.21%
1M
0.57%
YTD
11.79%
6M
14.68%
1Y
30.65%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
5.61%
10Y*
7.57%

XLK

1D
-1.00%
1M
21.09%
YTD
36.47%
6M
35.71%
1Y
66.93%
3Y*
33.90%
5Y*
23.83%
10Y*
25.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWX vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWX
SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF
11.79%35.89%0.21%10.94%-19.98%9.66%13.41%18.18%-18.97%28.88%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
36.47%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GWX and XLK is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2007

0.67

The correlation between GWX and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GWX vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GWX
XLK

Industrials

22.0%
0.1%

Technology

15.1%
99.7%

Basic Materials

14.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%

-

Healthcare

8.5%

-

Financial Services

7.8%

-

Real Estate

7.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Energy

4.7%
0.2%

Communication Services

2.9%

-

Utilities

1.3%

-

Industrials

GWX
22.0%
XLK
0.1%

Technology

GWX
15.1%
XLK
99.7%

Basic Materials

GWX
14.5%
XLK

-

Consumer Cyclical

GWX
11.2%
XLK

-

Healthcare

GWX
8.5%
XLK

-

Financial Services

GWX
7.8%
XLK

-

Real Estate

GWX
7.2%
XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

GWX
4.7%
XLK

-

Energy

GWX
4.7%
XLK
0.2%

Communication Services

GWX
2.9%
XLK

-

Utilities

GWX
1.3%
XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWX vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWX
GWX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWX vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWXXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.52

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

4.22

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.03

14.16

-4.13

GWX vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWX and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWXXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

3.24

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.96

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

1.06

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.42

-0.19

Drawdowns

GWX vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWX drawdown since its inception was -63.25%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWX and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWXXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.25%

-82.05%

+18.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.91%

-15.92%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.73%

-25.66%

+10.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.58%

-33.56%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.27%

-33.56%

-11.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-1.00%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.74%

-34.96%

+20.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

4.74%

-1.68%

Volatility

GWX vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) is 5.21%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that GWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWXXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

6.98%

-1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.82%

16.68%

-3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.52%

20.82%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

24.90%

-8.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

24.49%

-7.13%

GWX vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWX vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

GWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWX
SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF
2.54%2.83%2.71%2.64%2.71%2.75%1.74%3.41%2.94%5.18%4.21%2.67%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.39%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


GWX and XLK have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to GWX (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWX dropped -63.25% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.84% vs 7.57% for GWX. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GWX has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.84% return vs 7.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GWX.

GWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.39% for XLK.

GWX is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. GWX tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Under USD2 Billion Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GWX and 0.08% for XLK.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWX and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer