GWPFX vs. YFSIX
GWPFX (American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6) and YFSIX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, GWPFX returned 9.26%/yr vs 9.10%/yr for YFSIX. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GWPFX charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YFSIX.
Performance
GWPFX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GWPFX achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 26.14% return.
GWPFX
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 1Y
- 18.10%
- 3Y*
- 19.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.31%
YFSIX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 5.26%
- 6M
- 15.31%
- YTD
- 26.14%
- 1Y
- 21.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
GWPFX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWPFX American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 | 9.81% | 20.46% | 20.08% | 28.78% | -26.99% | 18.56% | 25.39% | 27.19% | -6.61% | 20.49% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 26.14% | 14.91% | -0.34% | 16.64% | -9.15% | 13.13% | 18.46% | 24.40% | 2.18% | 20.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between GWPFX and YFSIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.71 |
The correlation between GWPFX and YFSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GWPFX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank
GWPFX
YFSIX
GWPFX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 (GWPFX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GWPFX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.25 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 1.68 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | 4.86 | +2.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GWPFX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWPFX drawdown since its inception was -52.51%, which is greater than YFSIX's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWPFX and YFSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GWPFX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.51% | -35.10% | -17.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.78% | -14.20% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.40% | -14.20% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.15% | -25.14% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -1.64% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -4.89% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 4.86% | -2.01% |
Volatility
GWPFX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 (GWPFX) is 4.86%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that GWPFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GWPFX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.86% | 5.39% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | 15.89% | -2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.82% | 22.65% | -6.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.49% | 15.78% | +2.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.66% | 16.35% | +25.31% |
GWPFX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GWPFX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GWPFX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison
GWPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWPFX American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 | 5.24% | 5.75% | 5.81% | 1.60% | 9.84% | 3.39% | 3.41% | 5.77% | 6.18% | 3.35% | 4.30% | 4.75% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.68% | 8.02% | 4.32% | 8.18% | 4.76% | 6.59% | 0.71% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GWPFX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YFSIX has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to GWPFX (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWPFX dropped -52.51% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.
GWPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GWPFX and YFSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer