PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWPFX vs. RGAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWPFX vs. RGAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 (GWPFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWPFX achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than RGAGX's 10.24% return. Over the past 10 years, GWPFX has underperformed RGAGX with an annualized return of 13.34%, while RGAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.39% annualized return.


GWPFX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.60%
YTD
11.29%
6M
11.76%
1Y
28.07%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
13.34%

RGAGX

1D
-0.33%
1M
6.84%
YTD
10.24%
6M
9.86%
1Y
26.58%
3Y*
25.54%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*
16.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWPFX vs. RGAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWPFX
American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6
11.29%20.46%20.08%28.78%-26.99%18.56%25.39%27.19%-6.61%25.09%
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
10.24%20.08%28.41%37.66%-30.53%19.67%38.30%29.22%-2.88%26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between GWPFX and RGAGX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.98

The correlation between GWPFX and RGAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWPFX vs. RGAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWPFX
GWPFX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GWPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GWPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

RGAGX
RGAGX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
RGAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RGAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWPFX vs. RGAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 (GWPFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWPFXRGAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

1.99

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.80

7.76

+3.03

GWPFX vs. RGAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWPFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the RGAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWPFX and RGAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWPFXRGAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.80

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.64

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.84

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.86

-0.51

Drawdowns

GWPFX vs. RGAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWPFX drawdown since its inception was -52.51%, which is greater than RGAGX's maximum drawdown of -36.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWPFX and RGAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWPFXRGAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.51%

-36.19%

-16.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

-13.71%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.40%

-21.54%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.15%

-36.19%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.51%

-36.19%

-16.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.33%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-5.49%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

3.50%

-0.84%

Volatility

GWPFX vs. RGAGX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 (GWPFX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6 (RGAGX) have volatilities of 3.82% and 3.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWPFXRGAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

3.69%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

11.65%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

15.15%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.23%

20.25%

-2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.64%

19.69%

+21.95%

GWPFX vs. RGAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWPFX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than RGAGX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWPFX vs. RGAGX - Dividend Comparison

GWPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, less than RGAGX's 9.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWPFX
American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6
5.17%5.75%5.81%1.60%9.84%3.39%3.41%5.77%6.18%3.35%4.30%4.75%
RGAGX
American Funds The Growth Fund of America Class R-6
9.97%10.99%9.29%7.70%4.44%8.49%4.57%7.93%12.36%7.34%6.95%9.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, GWPFX and RGAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GWPFX has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to RGAGX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWPFX dropped -52.51% vs RGAGX's -36.19%.

GWPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWPFX and RGAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer