PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWPFX vs. MDGCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWPFX vs. MDGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 (GWPFX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWPFX achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly lower than MDGCX's 19.80% return. Over the past 10 years, GWPFX has outperformed MDGCX with an annualized return of 13.34%, while MDGCX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.56% annualized return.


GWPFX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.60%
YTD
11.29%
6M
11.76%
1Y
28.07%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
13.34%

MDGCX

1D
0.70%
1M
7.14%
YTD
19.80%
6M
21.05%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWPFX vs. MDGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWPFX
American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6
11.29%20.46%20.08%28.78%-26.99%18.56%25.39%27.19%-6.61%25.09%
MDGCX
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.
19.80%23.61%10.87%22.43%-17.94%17.52%15.61%25.54%-11.73%23.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GWPFX and MDGCX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.94

The correlation between GWPFX and MDGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWPFX vs. MDGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWPFX
GWPFX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GWPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
GWPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

MDGCX
MDGCX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MDGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MDGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWPFX vs. MDGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 (GWPFX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWPFXMDGCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.59

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

5.05

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.80

23.35

-12.56

GWPFX vs. MDGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWPFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the MDGCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWPFX and MDGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWPFXMDGCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

3.24

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.74

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.73

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.66

-0.31

Drawdowns

GWPFX vs. MDGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWPFX drawdown since its inception was -52.51%, which is greater than MDGCX's maximum drawdown of -48.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWPFX and MDGCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWPFXMDGCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.51%

-48.25%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

-8.07%

-3.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.40%

-21.46%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.15%

-26.68%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.51%

-34.87%

-17.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-9.93%

+4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

1.74%

+0.92%

Volatility

GWPFX vs. MDGCX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6 (GWPFX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) have volatilities of 3.82% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWPFXMDGCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

3.75%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

10.02%

+1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

12.57%

+1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.23%

16.15%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.64%

17.25%

+24.39%

GWPFX vs. MDGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWPFX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than MDGCX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWPFX vs. MDGCX - Dividend Comparison

GWPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, less than MDGCX's 7.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWPFX
American Funds Global Growth Fund Class R-6
5.17%5.75%5.81%1.60%9.84%3.39%3.41%5.77%6.18%3.35%4.30%4.75%
MDGCX
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.
7.44%8.91%7.78%1.42%1.75%16.75%3.77%1.73%4.06%34.82%0.65%5.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GWPFX and MDGCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GWPFX has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to MDGCX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWPFX dropped -52.51% vs MDGCX's -48.25%.

MDGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWPFX and MDGCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer