PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWPCX vs. BLUEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWPCX vs. BLUEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Growth Portfolio Class C (GWPCX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWPCX achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly higher than BLUEX's -6.58% return. Over the past 10 years, GWPCX has outperformed BLUEX with an annualized return of 12.55%, while BLUEX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.39% annualized return.


GWPCX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.55%
YTD
10.95%
6M
11.36%
1Y
27.13%
3Y*
21.23%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
12.55%

BLUEX

1D
-1.34%
1M
0.16%
YTD
-6.58%
6M
-6.15%
1Y
-6.22%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWPCX vs. BLUEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWPCX
American Funds Growth Portfolio Class C
10.95%19.58%19.26%27.77%-27.51%17.70%24.46%26.74%-7.31%24.19%
BLUEX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund
-6.58%4.45%7.24%14.35%-14.30%3.22%34.74%35.34%-4.91%27.86%

Correlation

The correlation between GWPCX and BLUEX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between GWPCX and BLUEX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWPCX vs. BLUEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWPCX
GWPCX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
GWPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GWPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BLUEX
BLUEX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BLUEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLUEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLUEX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BLUEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLUEX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWPCX vs. BLUEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Growth Portfolio Class C (GWPCX) and AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWPCXBLUEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.90

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

-0.55

+2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.33

-1.37

+11.69

GWPCX vs. BLUEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWPCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is higher than the BLUEX Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWPCX and BLUEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWPCXBLUEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

-0.67

+2.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.03

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.57

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.49

+0.21

Drawdowns

GWPCX vs. BLUEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWPCX drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum BLUEX drawdown of -54.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWPCX and BLUEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWPCXBLUEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-54.27%

+19.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.88%

-12.19%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.49%

-12.19%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

-21.87%

-12.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

-29.06%

-5.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.53%

+8.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-13.37%

+7.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

4.85%

-2.16%

Volatility

GWPCX vs. BLUEX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Growth Portfolio Class C (GWPCX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund (BLUEX) at 3.48%. This indicates that GWPCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLUEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWPCXBLUEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.48%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

7.75%

+3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.23%

9.98%

+4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.23%

10.62%

+7.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

16.59%

+1.44%

GWPCX vs. BLUEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWPCX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BLUEX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWPCX vs. BLUEX - Dividend Comparison

GWPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, more than BLUEX's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLUEX
AMG Veritas Global Real Return Fund
0.33%0.31%0.29%0.03%11.84%27.20%25.43%13.71%13.40%0.00%0.00%0.24%
GWPCX
American Funds Growth Portfolio Class C
5.08%5.63%5.59%0.96%9.93%3.48%3.04%5.54%5.45%2.73%3.67%4.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


GWPCX and BLUEX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWPCX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to BLUEX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWPCX dropped -34.59% vs BLUEX's -54.27%.

GWPCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWPCX and BLUEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer