PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWO-PQ.TO vs. SLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GWO-PQ.TO vs. SLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Great-West Lifeco Inc. (GWO-PQ.TO) and Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GWO-PQ.TO is traded in CAD, while SLF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SLF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWO-PQ.TO achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than SLF's 20.92% return. Over the past 10 years, GWO-PQ.TO has underperformed SLF with an annualized return of 5.33%, while SLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.19% annualized return.


GWO-PQ.TO

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.04%
1Y
10.24%
3Y*
11.08%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
5.33%

SLF

1D
1.28%
1M
2.77%
YTD
20.92%
6M
28.49%
1Y
19.38%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
14.18%
10Y*
13.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWO-PQ.TO vs. SLF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWO-PQ.TO
Great-West Lifeco Inc.
1.17%14.52%18.43%5.04%-17.89%6.47%9.03%14.71%-4.34%8.03%
SLF
Sun Life Financial Inc.
20.92%4.69%29.75%15.18%-6.68%28.54%-0.17%35.68%-9.28%4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between GWO-PQ.TO and SLF is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2012

0.10

The correlation between GWO-PQ.TO and SLF shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWO-PQ.TO vs. SLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWO-PQ.TO
GWO-PQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
GWO-PQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWO-PQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWO-PQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GWO-PQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWO-PQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SLF
SLF Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLF Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWO-PQ.TO vs. SLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Great-West Lifeco Inc. (GWO-PQ.TO) and Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GWO-PQ.TOSLFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.20

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

1.37

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.73

3.34

+2.40

GWO-PQ.TO vs. SLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWO-PQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the SLF Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWO-PQ.TO and SLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GWO-PQ.TOSLFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

1.00

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.84

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.65

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.57

-0.13

Drawdowns

GWO-PQ.TO vs. SLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWO-PQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.24%, smaller than the maximum SLF drawdown of -46.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWO-PQ.TO and SLF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWO-PQ.TOSLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.24%

-46.22%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.88%

-14.19%

+9.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.50%

-14.19%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.17%

-24.51%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.24%

-46.22%

+9.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

0.00%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-9.31%

+4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

5.82%

-4.03%

Volatility

GWO-PQ.TO vs. SLF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Great-West Lifeco Inc. (GWO-PQ.TO) is 2.41%, while Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that GWO-PQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWO-PQ.TOSLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

6.85%

-4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.12%

13.72%

-7.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.46%

19.54%

-11.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.73%

16.97%

-6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.32%

20.43%

-8.11%

Dividends

GWO-PQ.TO vs. SLF - Dividend Comparison

GWO-PQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, more than SLF's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWO-PQ.TO
Great-West Lifeco Inc.
5.61%5.52%5.98%6.65%6.54%5.06%5.13%5.30%5.76%5.21%5.34%5.52%
SLF
Sun Life Financial Inc.
3.64%4.03%4.00%4.98%4.59%3.32%3.69%3.47%4.71%3.17%3.98%4.64%

Financials

GWO-PQ.TO vs. SLF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Great-West Lifeco Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-5.00B0.005.00B10.00B15.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
8.88B
(GWO-PQ.TO) Total Revenue
(SLF) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GWO-PQ.TO values in CAD, SLF values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


GWO-PQ.TO and SLF have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWO-PQ.TO and SLF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer