GWGIX vs. ARSVX
GWGIX (AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Fund) and ARSVX (AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - GWGIX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AMG, while ARSVX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, GWGIX returned 11.24%/yr vs 9.24%/yr for ARSVX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GWGIX charges 0.87%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for ARSVX.
Performance
GWGIX vs. ARSVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GWGIX achieves a 17.30% return, which is significantly higher than ARSVX's 3.28% return. Over the past 10 years, GWGIX has outperformed ARSVX with an annualized return of 11.24%, while ARSVX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.24% annualized return.
GWGIX
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- YTD
- 17.30%
- 6M
- 14.74%
- 1Y
- 26.64%
- 3Y*
- 13.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
ARSVX
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 3.28%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- -1.46%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.51%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
GWGIX vs. ARSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWGIX AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Fund | 17.30% | 1.53% | 10.85% | 14.76% | -18.09% | 26.01% | 23.31% | 31.02% | -8.14% | 15.44% |
ARSVX AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund | 3.28% | -7.36% | 14.05% | 14.86% | -6.49% | 21.14% | 1.84% | 38.29% | -6.96% | 11.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between GWGIX and ARSVX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.87 |
The correlation between GWGIX and ARSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GWGIX vs. ARSVX — Risk / Return Rank
GWGIX
ARSVX
GWGIX vs. ARSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Fund (GWGIX) and AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GWGIX | ARSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.01 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | -0.05 | +2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.48 | -0.10 | +9.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GWGIX vs. ARSVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GWGIX drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, smaller than the maximum ARSVX drawdown of -54.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWGIX and ARSVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GWGIX | ARSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.41% | -54.85% | +17.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.90% | -16.62% | +6.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.85% | -19.21% | -6.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.18% | -19.21% | -7.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.41% | -40.52% | +3.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.10% | +10.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -8.68% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 8.36% | -5.49% |
Volatility
GWGIX vs. ARSVX - Volatility Comparison
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Fund (GWGIX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) at 3.35%. This indicates that GWGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GWGIX | ARSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 3.35% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.76% | 13.85% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 17.13% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 17.85% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.27% | 19.36% | +0.91% |
GWGIX vs. ARSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GWGIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than ARSVX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GWGIX vs. ARSVX - Dividend Comparison
Neither GWGIX nor ARSVX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARSVX AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.50% | 4.78% | 3.87% | 7.75% | 0.00% | 12.10% | 13.01% | 14.96% | 4.96% | 6.51% |
GWGIX AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.95% | 0.19% | 4.22% | 5.45% | 0.12% | 0.37% | 2.48% | 1.46% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GWGIX and ARSVX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GWGIX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to ARSVX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWGIX dropped -37.41% vs ARSVX's -54.85%.
GWGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GWGIX and ARSVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer