PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GWGIX vs. ARSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GWGIX vs. ARSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Fund (GWGIX) and AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWGIX achieves a 17.30% return, which is significantly higher than ARSVX's 3.28% return. Over the past 10 years, GWGIX has outperformed ARSVX with an annualized return of 11.24%, while ARSVX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.24% annualized return.


GWGIX

1D
1.57%
1M
3.63%
YTD
17.30%
6M
14.74%
1Y
26.64%
3Y*
13.27%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
11.24%

ARSVX

1D
1.23%
1M
3.21%
YTD
3.28%
6M
1.65%
1Y
-1.46%
3Y*
6.53%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
9.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GWGIX vs. ARSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GWGIX
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Fund
17.30%1.53%10.85%14.76%-18.09%26.01%23.31%31.02%-8.14%15.44%
ARSVX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund
3.28%-7.36%14.05%14.86%-6.49%21.14%1.84%38.29%-6.96%11.73%

Correlation

The correlation between GWGIX and ARSVX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.87

The correlation between GWGIX and ARSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GWGIX vs. ARSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GWGIX
GWGIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
GWGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GWGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

ARSVX
ARSVX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
ARSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ARSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GWGIX vs. ARSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Fund (GWGIX) and AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GWGIXARSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.01

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

-0.05

+2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.48

-0.10

+9.58

GWGIX vs. ARSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the ARSVX Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWGIX and ARSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GWGIX vs. ARSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWGIX drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, smaller than the maximum ARSVX drawdown of -54.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWGIX and ARSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GWGIXARSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.41%

-54.85%

+17.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.90%

-16.62%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.85%

-19.21%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.18%

-19.21%

-7.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.41%

-40.52%

+3.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.10%

+10.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-8.68%

+1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

8.36%

-5.49%

Volatility

GWGIX vs. ARSVX - Volatility Comparison

AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Fund (GWGIX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund (ARSVX) at 3.35%. This indicates that GWGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GWGIXARSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

3.35%

+2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.76%

13.85%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.74%

17.13%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.98%

17.85%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.27%

19.36%

+0.91%

GWGIX vs. ARSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWGIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than ARSVX's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

GWGIX vs. ARSVX - Dividend Comparison

Neither GWGIX nor ARSVX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARSVX
AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%8.50%4.78%3.87%7.75%0.00%12.10%13.01%14.96%4.96%6.51%
GWGIX
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Fund
0.00%0.00%0.95%0.19%4.22%5.45%0.12%0.37%2.48%1.46%0.05%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GWGIX and ARSVX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GWGIX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to ARSVX (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWGIX dropped -37.41% vs ARSVX's -54.85%.

GWGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GWGIX and ARSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer